Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: The video was quite funny (Score 3, Insightful) 90

They have direct access to extremely detailed market data about what customers search for and which designs they ultimately buy.

That's obviously an advantage that allows them to select which designs to copy far earlier than anyone else in the industry. If you stack on top of that the ability to dynamically adjust their prices so they're always undercutting the very products they copied... well, that seems to be reaching the point of anti-competitive practices.

Comment Re: Stallman looks like a prophet (Score 1) 145

Modification of cars should be limited, especially as autonomous cars roll out. You shouldnâ(TM)t be allowed to make unregulated modifications to your vehicle that might result in death or injury to other motorists. If you want to modify your car, fine, just keep it off public roads.

Comment Re:is being vindictive a new democratic value? (Score 1) 333

No, that doesn't follow logically. Hiring a criminal to obtain evidence is obviously a crime itself. Stolen evidence is inadmissible if the police were a party to the crime.

Think of it this way. If a thief robs a mafia boss but gets arrested as he flees the scene, any evidence on him doesn't magically become inadmissible. It would only be inadmissible if the police asked him to rob the mafia boss in the first place.

Comment Re:Pat-a-cake, pat-a-cake, baker's man (Score 1) 339

I don't see the conflict. They can both police content and be immune from prosecution for the content user's post on their website.

I'm not responsible if you come into my store and start threatening my customers with a gun. Your argument is that because I'm not responsible, I'm not allowed to prohibit guns in my store? What kind of sense does that make?

Comment Re:Pat-a-cake, pat-a-cake, baker's man (Score 1) 339

Parler agreed to the ToS when they signed up for AWS. They violated that ToS. Amazon terminated the contract.

It seems like Parler's argument here is that what AWS is doing is anti-competitive because Twitter *also* violated the ToS.

The obvious remedy would just be to ban Twitter too, but Twitter can reasonably argue that they are making a good faith effort to meet AWS's standards.

Furthermore, it seems like enforcement of Amazon's ToS is entirely up to Amazon. If they want to selectively enforce them, I'm not sure there's much of anything Parler can do about it. Maybe they have a case if they argue Amazon is discriminating against a protected class... but "Conservative" and "Republican" are not protected classes.

Slashdot Top Deals

Business is a good game -- lots of competition and minimum of rules. You keep score with money. -- Nolan Bushnell, founder of Atari

Working...