Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Is there insurance for a sysadmin's hands/fingers?

mistiry writes: I've seen and heard of people that hold insurance policies protecting them against loss of limb. Specifically, limbs that, without them, the person would not be able to perform their job duties.

I've seen violinists who hold insurance in case their fingers, hands, or arms were dismembered. Also, according to The History Channel, the taste tester for Ben & Jerry's holds a $1M USD policy for his tongue.

Well, as a sysadmin, are there similar policies to protect me in case I were to lose a hand or an arm? I can think of dozens of jobs where a policy like this would be a benefit. What would a web designer do should they lose an arm in a car accident.

Does anyone hold a policy like this? Or know of a company that offers this type of insurance?

Comment Re:I appreciate the warning (Score 1) 535

I'll third that. Or fourth, or whatever. I rarely buy games, and games I want to play I can get from Gamefly. When I do buy a game, it's because I felt it was good enough to deserve my money, or I'd like to play it more than once. (ex: I purchased Fallout 3 so that I could follow the several different routes you can go on).

Now Capcom thinks I don't own a game I purchased, or have the right to replay or resell a product I legally own? This brings back memories of a certain company removing a certain feature from a certain game console.

And because of that debacle, Sony will get none of my money, ever. Now Capcom will not either.

Comment Re:Obama's too conservative (Score 1) 688

Would you feel safer buying milk without the inspection of the farms, the FDA rules regulating what can and cannot be fed to the cows, pasteurization and homogenization?

That all came about because the FDA regulates shit like that. As much as we hate the government, regulatory bodies overall force the producers of XYZ to follow guidelines and rules for the benefit of the consumer.

Comment Re:Obama's too conservative (Score 5, Insightful) 688

Additionally, legalization will allow users to know exactly WHAT is in the pot their buying.

Why would Joe Potsmoker want to go buy from some random dealer down the street and have to guess to the quality and contents, whereas if it were legal nobody would pick a dealer over going down to the store and picking some up that you know for sure is good quality and has met the regulations laid out by the authoritative body assigned to do so.

I am a daily smoker. I have graduated college, I have a great job, I support my family. I pay taxes, I donate to charities. I help others when I am able. Yet, in the eyes of Uncle Sam, I am a horrible person that deserves incarceration for my unspeakable acts against my country and people. It is a fucking joke. Anslinger drug (pun intended) MJ through the mud with scare tactics and blatant lies. Not one justification for making it illegal given by Anslinger or the government at that time held any water.

There is no logical, scientific, or rational reason to maintain the illegal, SCHEDULE 1 (same as the hard drugs, i.e. heroin, crack cocaine, etc.) classification that the government has on MJ.

Comment Re:Games on Linux means the end of the MS Empire (Score 1) 503

Oh? Are they releasing 100% compatible versions of Windows XP, IE6, and Microsoft Office? I ask because these are the only things the business world uses.

I've worked at several places in the last 2 years where I saw no installations of XP or IE6, and I've also worked at several places where XP and IE6 were used. I've seen installations of OpenOffice, Firefox, and even Linux desktops.

The point, though, is that your statement that XP/IE6/MSO is the only things the business world uses may have been true ~5 years ago, but not anymore.

Comment Re:Toss up (Score 2) 119

Has anyone successfully fought the government in a legal battle and won?

How many times has the Supreme Court ruled 'XYZ Law' as 'Unconstitutional'? Would you not consider that someone successfully challenging the government in a legal battle?

Government makes law. Citizen challenges law. Law is overturned. Seems like a WIN to me...

Comment Re:DUI Checkpoints (Score 1) 601

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

What probable cause have I given the police to stop me, require me to prove my legal standing to operate the vehicle (my license), show that I am insured, and PROVE that I am innocent (not driving above the legal BAC), by simply driving home from Wal Mart at 2am? I am subjected to sobriety tests and breathalyzers when I have given no cause or reason for anyone to believe I am over the legal BAC.

A checkpoint forces the driver to prove his innocence, however the law states that you are already innocent until they can prove you guilty.

Stopping a driver that is driving erratically, or failing to abide by the laws of the road, are a reason for police to stop you.

Stopping EVERY driver on a road and forcing them to prove their legality on multiple levels* in hopes of catching a handful of actual offenders is NOT legal.

* You have to prove:
- You hold a legal driver's license.
- You hold valid insurance.
- You are up to date on registration and inspections.
- You are not above the legal limit.

Submission + - Do you get notifications when you post as AC?

mistiry writes: I don't really ever post as AC, usually if I forget to log in or something is the only time.

I'm just curious, do you get notifications on moderation or replies to your AC posts? Or only if posted under your account? I imagine the latter, but I was just trying to confirm.

Slashdot Top Deals

Oh, so there you are!

Working...