Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
User Journal

Journal Journal: DisCrimiNation should be better defined for everyone. 4

Bigotry based on economics, social, and/or genetic defaults/dejure is still a hate crime against humanity. When I look at the USA Drug-War, Bush-War ... I see bigotry on an obscenely grand scale resulting in crime and murder on the streets of the USA and Baghdad Iraq. The politicians and other wave a flag and thump a book as justification for wasting young lives and money, and the public accept it a truth and the American-way (pitiable).

The USA, in many ways, is far more primitive than the ideals pontificated by politicians for votes.

Most national/international religious leaders (Falwell, Robertson ...), politicians (Bush, Chaney ...), autocrats (Kissinger, Poindexter ...) , plutocrats (Wolfowitz, Gates ...) dogmatist/corporatist (many, many more ...) and their delusional self-serving followers are genetic parasitic afflictions upon all humanity. I stuck with a few of the better known USA names, but there are plenty more for US, EU, UN others globally.

The US, EU, UN others are Disrespected Criminal Nations due to pseudo-leaders (economics, social, and/or genetic defaults/dejure leaders) of all types supporting bigotry as reasonable and acceptable with faux-religion [AKA: mythology] and false-ideals [AKA: s/pun-truths].

Sun Tzu (or any good strategist) would look the Drug-War, Bush-War ... as very tragic foolish follies that were planned and implemented by idiots. Wasting the most valuable of national resources, our Warriors, on the execution of lies, bullshit-logic, and dogmatism, which will never provide victory for US, is tragic for family, friends, our Nation, and all Humanity.

We must reevaluate our Cultural-Imperatives in the USA National Interest or fall into history as a 50-year WWII blip/fluke/coincidental... leader in human-rights and global-security.

United States

Journal Journal: MIT's Emerging Technologies Conference (ETC) ... HOWTO ....

MIT's [http://www.mit.edu/] ETC is September 25-27, 2007

I mention this to give some folks in the glorious “/.” community enough time to make plans. Though I (a lowly worker-bee or pack-mule), would love to attend, I am never allowed/funded ($%#&^@!) to have any mental fun (dang it to all hells again!~). Anyway, I strongly recommend, for all y'all USA Corporatist CEO/CIO/... types, Gov/DOD “Top” Congressional/SES and GO “Staffers” and folks with spare cash (about $3.5K, ETC fee, hotel, travel, late night fun ...). Yes, we all know you staffers and other less savory govern agents are lurking/participating in the “/.” community (spies and marketeers the whole lot of you are! Argggg?~).

!HAVEFUN! Also, I do not have a degree [I'm a 55yo, USA high school dropout], I have never been to MIT, and ...; however, I do read slowly, comprehend very well, and know a bunch of useful shit. MIT's TechnologyReview [http://www.technologyreview.com/events/tretc/] has for decades been a resource for me to learn. I even know how to spell “OPEN” “GPL” “OKI” “...”, because of some of them radical revolutionary MIT gurus/professors bringing some bright light to kill the unknown darkness with knowledge, and the evil dogmatist gremlins with searing pain [?PTL?]. BTW, don't y'all /.'em, it would be funny if MIT could not handle the load, but this ain't no 2007/04/01 prank (just some good FYI stuff for some folks).

Emerging Technologies from Around the World and How to Make Them Matter
[http://www.technologyreview.com/events/tretc/]

Technology Review’s Emerging Technologies Conference at MIT brings you remarkable technological breakthroughs that will transform the way we live and do business. This unique event brings together business leaders, venture capitalists, senior technologists, and a remarkable group of the top 35 innovators under the age of 35—the TR35.

Technology Review’s Emerging Technologies Conference at MIT is an event unlike any other. If you are in charge of the strategic direction of your organization or simply passionate about technology, it’s one you can’t afford to miss. The 7th annual event will be held on the beautiful MIT Campus in Cambridge, MA, on September 25-27, 2007, and will include:

  • Presentations from world-renowned business leaders

  • Showcase and demonstration of emerging technologies from leading companies

  • Breakout sessions focusing on the latest developments in specific areas of technology

  • Unveiling of the 2007 TR35 –the top 35 innovators under the age of 35

  • Unparalleled networking opportunities with the people you need to meet in the technology industry—venture capitalists, innovators and visionaries, corporate leaders, and entrepreneurs

(%~o) For me there is only last years coverage ... View 2006 multimedia coverage [http://www.technologyreview.com/events/tretc/media.aspx] recorded directly from the 2006 MIT ETC. Listen to podcasts of the entire event, view video interviews of select speakers, or read blogs and related stories.

User Journal

Journal Journal: Gods, Magic Tricks, Religion, and Politics ... 2

Same Old Shit is always Politics (AKA: Politically Correct [PC]).

REMEMBER:
Gods do not kill people,
Guns do not kill people,
Only People kill people,
Religious-truths kill folks,
Politics as spun-truths kill folks,
Democrats, Republicans ... politicians kill US.

The PC magic-trick spin converts lies to votes.
Sex=Sin=Morality=Damnation=Votes
Crime=Reality=Theater=Violence=Votes
Diseases=Dogma=Punishment=dirty=Votes
Addiction=Drugs=Corruption=Evil=Votes
Slang=Music=Destruction=Lies=Votes
Poor=Laziness=Uneducated=Flaw=Votes ...
Well, I could continue ....

A spun-truth is a story told that
will never recognize the truth;
therefore, never solve a problem;
however, will provide PC votes.

Politics is Politics ...
Democrats are Republicans ...
Republicans are Democrats ...
Citizens are People ...
Government for People is DEMOCRACY
Corporatist Government is Tyranny by Tyrants

ALWAYS, VOTE-OUT any incumbent and then
brand them with a tattoo to make sure they
are never again elected anywhere in this world.

User Journal

Journal Journal: All is right with the world? BigBoy [Brother] lives well ...

All is right with the world of US, EU, and ....

FYI: US, EU ... it is horrible to have our beliefs destroyed by reality AT&T spying on citizens for US government, but we all live in totalitarian nations. Fortunately for US, EU and some others it has allowed US and EU to maintain delusional beliefs that we have enough cake and can eat cake forever. Let's not blame terrorist for US and EU citizens being fools.

I refer you and all political/religious dogmatist to "http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/P._T._Barnum" for a few appropriate comments on the state of the supposed religion democracies.

You can fool some of the people all of the time;
you can fool all of the people some of the time,
but you can never fool all of the people all of the time.
However, most of the time most of US, EU ... are the
exploitable fools of flag-waving faux-patriots, bible-thumping
pseudo-prophets, history-revisionist plutocrats/corporatist marketeers.

A few more appropriate sayings about fools like US, EU ....
* A fool and his money are soon parted.
* Every crowd has a silver lining.
* No one went broke underestimating public taste.
* I don't care what they say about me, just make sure they spell my name right!
* You'll never go broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people.
* There is a sucker born every minute

Just yesterday I heard the USA VP (the P prior too) say "stating a time table or schedule ... tells the terrorist ...." Well folks I can say if we had not been fooled to go there in the first place, then there would be allot less terrorist getting real hands on training killing our Warriors, brothers, sisters, moms and dads ... and the whole region would not be totally destabilized for further emergence of more terrorist [THANKS YOU VERY MUCH P&VP].

All US, EU ... citizens should laugh, because it is far to painful ... if you don't laugh at yourself!

An unsettling perspective/comment on beliefs is not troll/flame ... just reality as I perceive it.
"Reality is self-induced hallucination."
--
"Reality is self-induced hallucination." (%~o)

User Journal

Journal Journal: Curiosity killed the cat and created gods .... 5

/. Zonk Post: Humans Hardwired to Believe in Supernatural Deity? http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/04/1925246

No genetics and survival of the fittest depends on knowing what others fear, deny, and/or evade.
Curiosity, depends on genetics and survival of the fittest, to have the courage to overcome our
fear, deny flight/fight lower brain functions, and invade the unknown to learn and survive.

So curiosity created mythology, mythology allows gods to exist and explain the unknown, and curiosity
allows unknowns to exist a little longer than the human-science observation/discovery of the obvious.

IOW: Gods are just VR [AKA: fiction/fantasy] definitions of the unknown by fearful and superstitious
humans until reality is known. NOTE: A dogmatist fears, denies, and evades all facts and evidence that
conflict with their delusional schizoid superstitions.

It is natural and genetic based for humans to question and seek answers; however, a dogmatist is
adelophobic, and can only accept that their dogma beliefs provide all answers to all possible question.

The adelophobic dogmatist always have a potential for sociopathic reactionary behavior that would
eliminate any guilt response to the murder of another human that they are convinced threatens their
dogma (reality) beliefs. The adelophobic dogmatist is extreamly delusional and believes that there are
significant very real rewards for their dogmatic acts of murder, genocide, suicide ....

Fortunately we are humans (not cats) curiosity does not cause our death, but the delusions of the
mentally ill and emotionally unstable adelophobic dogmatist may seek direct/proxy action another
humans death. Pity the mentally ill, but be aware and vigilant ... very aware of those crazy folks.

User Journal

Journal Journal: I hope somebody tells them to go to hell ..."Devil's Game"

"Devil's Game", "Blackwater Mercenaries", Islamist/Christian/Jewish fundamentalist .... My observation is there are to many smokey-screens to reject the probability that there is a group of arsonist profiteering from incinerating people, burning buildings and towns, and destroying limited and valuable assets to increase the value of available remaining resources. This is why I am always collectively referring to corporatist, politicians, mega-church/temple/mosque televangelist [AKA: plutocrats] and their dogmatist followers as the root of all evil in the world. Plutocrats calling on god personally or attributing satanic powers to a another human is narcissistic cynical blasphemy by megalomaniacs.

George Bush, Osama Bin Ladin, Enron/Tyco/... CEOs/CFOs/... Sharon, Nasser, Saud, Arafat, Stalin, Putin, Mao, Hua, Pahlavi, Khomeini, Torquemada, Marcos, Tojo, Hitler, Napoleon, Tweed, Greeley, Kennedy, Capone ... would all agree (if together) over a drink and dead bodies ... if they (the citizens) are of no value to me then neither are their (folks) lives .... If there is a problem you can always convince the dogmatist to kill the others, if the problem persist due to the demise of the dogmatist, then you can always pay half the citizens (chattel) to kill the other half, then it will become a policing problem to collect up the last of any trouble makers or petty power brokers.

For me the last few decades Korea and Vietnam to today prove there is only a veil of difference between todays governing+governed and the preindustrial feudal aristocracy governing+governed. IOW: we are FOOL (Fycked Out Of Luck) and the treatment of our veterans from the Civil War to todays Bush-Iraq conflict [AKA: Police Action] is just the present proof that evil throughout history is of plutocrat-human origin only. God has no need to kill (blood-sacrifice) folks or babies, but mentally ill and emotionally disturbed greedy plutocrats will always find a reason for human blood-sacrifice just like any other superstitious primitive human suffering from delusions of grandeur and expectations of earthly and afterlife demigod perfection/rewards..

I have great respect for all Warriors of every nation/culture, because they are the essence of the honorable WoeFolk knights of old protecting and defending family, friends, ideals, innocents ... and delivering the last measure of life for the good of others. Warriors never rape, pillage, murder ... they just kill their enemy, accept their surrender, and destroy religious, government, corporate ... institutions. Warriors can be mislead and abused by leaders, but never can they be dishonored. There were some WWII German Warriors who refused to murder Jews and Gypsies and were sent to the Russian front ... German Warriors were never dishonored, Nazi soldiers/murders were a disgrace to all humanity ... not just Germany. Slave-holders of today and the past are an injury to humanity, but Southern/Northern Warriors were never dishonored. IOW: Only you can dishonor yourself ... it is far better to die in a gas-chamber with a Jew/Muslim, then harm or murder another human.

Oh, well, it looks like I spilled to much again ... forgetting where I am ... but never who!

User Journal

Journal Journal: AC, Thanks for being an insightful person

Consumer Revolt Spurred Via the Internet [http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/23/1417202&from=rss]
"UK's newspaper Independent outlines the brewing consumer revolt being fomented on the web.

AC [Anonymous Coward] speaks ... Here in the United States
Our businesses are smarter and have forseen the trend. They are rallying against the consumers who believe they have rights.
= = = = = = = = = = = =

AC is indeed insightful, because to be insightful you must be observant of situations, people, processes ... and then be able to (via epiphany or logic) derive a reasonable or accurate description of facts and/or causes of the situations, people, processes ... conditions.

I do not know who AC is, but if I did I would click-friend the person AC. AC's ability to observe and derive personal conclusions that indeed do reflect reality in the USA, EU, China, Russia, Canada, Mexico ... is beyond insightful ... it is prescient. I regret that I have no moderator points today to provide to AC.

Ditto: "I know you're telling the truth but do you mind sharing *why* you feel this way? This comment doesn't deserve an "Insightful" rating unless he can back it up." This is a statement in conflict (I feel) with logical use of words. You know AC is truthful implies that you may be in possession of facts that would support AC's insightful observations, but then you ask AC for feelings, rather than more facts to support those you appear to already have obtained by some real data collection. It was just odd to me the way you worded your comment, which I understand when folks use ESL. The support you provided to AC ... I am sure is appreciated by AC.

JonWan: "Well customers do have rights, but so do businesses." is incorrect, because rights as in "Civil/Human Rights" cannot be reserved or legislated to cover any institutions with "RIGHTS". Institutions (society, businesses, governments, religions, clubs, marriage ...) are created by "Civil Law" mandated by "Human Citizens" any institution can be dissolved, terminated, destroyed ... by "Civil Law" when mandated by "Human Citizens" for whatever reason. However, when a "Human Citizens" is destroyed, terminated, dissolved ... by an institution then a crime against humanity has occurred, this is true for capital-punishment, war, famine, genocide ... :"FOR ME" only self-defense to protect the life of family, friends, others and self is justifiable, but might be punishable by an institutions following the letters of the law, legal yes, but never would it be justice. Institutions cannot think, feel, and/or act in anyway, institutions are inanimate objects created and controlled by "Human Citizens". My observations, make me believe, that USA prison populations should be 50/50, one half murders, pedophiles, drug-dealers ... the other half should be politicians, CEOs/CFOs, market-traders, pseudo-prophet/televangelists ....

Having said the above, please notice I do not include SBA/AFF [Small Business Americans or American Family Farmers in the Western Hemisphere]. I know the SBA/AFF are as fucked as the rest of US, EU ....

User Journal

Journal Journal: God as identified and/or defined by US (Good, Bad, or Evil)? 3

God as identified and/or defined by anyone, anything, any religion, any government ... has never existed. IOW: a god cannot be copyrighted, claimed, patented ... except by weak, fearful, slaves of "the unknown and may never be" destiny/option.

Too Know and Too Fear will always be mutually exclusive or inversely proportional!

Knowledge can eliminate fear. Fear prevents knowing facts. Religion as practiced in all of humanity today evades facts, exploits hopes, and is fear based for control of the uneducated masses. The uneducated masses are always a usable weapon for the megalomaniacs of our species [AKA: Genocidal Dogmatist].

Increasing knowledge will always decrease fear and/or dogmatic mythology. We can fear the atom-bomb, nanotechnology, biotechnology/bio-genetics ...; However, with knowledge we can mitigate or eliminate the fear.

Without knowledge our greatest fears can become self-fulfilling prophecies of mythology for a primitive maniacal suicidal species.

THINK ... "fire, wheel ..." and get past the Luddite/religious irrational fear. Just listen to any politician ... any damn lie can be made to sound like a great (science, religious, political ...) truth, but the facts remain after all marketeering, spinning, framing, revisions ... the pseudo-truths are lies by evil people and faux-prophets to fool folks and make hell on earth.

Again, I ask Good, Bad, or Evil? I think, great-evil will always be caused by faith-based dogma humans not any mythological god or demon, but what do you think or feel?

The Almighty Buck

Journal Journal: Plutocrats and Corporatist are [Good - Bad - Evil]? 4

Our military is forced to perform [for "Big-Biz" faux-prophet
politicians, corporatist, Mega-Church & Televangelist] rather then
end national security problems forever.

Politicians just improve stock dividends for our defense industry
corporatist while they use our Warriors as tools for ROI and they
provide tax-free Mega-Church & Televangelist (more BigBiz) USA
Constitutional protection while disenfranchising citizens.

All our right and liberty are being vested in soulless institutions
(religion, corporations, government ...) while citizens are now
persecuted by courts. In the future (I suspect) the growing USA
corporatist mercenary armies will keep the streets safe from US.

I am sick of democracy and capitalism being subverted, perverted,
and spun into corporatism. We need to move away from "Big-Biz"
faux-prophet politicians, corporatist, Mega-Church & Televangelist
treason, exploitation, and profitable species-suicide/genocide
religious/dogmatist war.

Democracy and capitalism are Good!
Dogmatic Politics and Religions are Bad!
Plutocrats and Corporatist are Evil!

NOTE: Plutocrats and Corporatist even control the Vatican, Mecca, Medina,
Sidney, Washington, Moscow, London, Tokyo, Paris, Tehran, Beijing, Dublin,
New Delhi .... Plutocrats and Corporatist are like parasitic organisms
infecting and killing humanity and our species destiny.

User Journal

Journal Journal: My understanding of Ayn Rand .... 7

My understanding of Ayn Rand is as an existentialist story teller [AKA: writer/philosopher].

Yes, I agree Ayn Rand was an objectivist; However, as an objectivist the story/philosophy must be equally skeptical of the wisdom of self and crowds. As an existentialist, you decide for only yourself (no others). As an objective existentialist, you may decide for only yourself (no others) which (self, crowd, ...) wisdom/philosophy a/o decision [AKA: The Experience and Knowledge (TEK)] is the best.

Ayn Rand the existential objectivist cannot reserve skepticism for just the crowd and remain "Objective". Ayn Rand the heroic "Existentialist" would never allow the crowd make her decision. Ayn Rand (and any other) "existential objectivist" would be prepared to defend her (his, your) decision, ideal, creation ..., and suffer any repercussions the crowd might impose for the decisions/actions.

NOTE: The "Rational Existential Objectivist [AKA: Authentic]" will prepare for escape/evasion from any cruel/severe repercussions, death is considered an option, and compromise is never an option. However, further acquisition of any unknown TEK (tacit/experiential) may change the decision, ideal, moral, creation ... of a "Rational Existential Objectivist" to comply with the new/altered state of personal TEK (never comply with others or a crowd.

IOW: "Objective Self" always makes the (right or wrong) decision and never denies that there is always potential for greater wisdom in a crowd. The objective individual self decides. The crowd is a functional or dysfunctional system of interdependent parts (an organism), responsible for actions taken, and controlling content/decisions compliance allowed by the parts in the organism.

Inexplicably "Rational Existential Objectivist" humans are capable of participating in social organisms without allowing the crowd to make any decisions on their behalf. The amoral/dogmatist behavior typically expressed in crowds; never controls the Authentic Individuals' decision-making.

User Journal

Journal Journal: Religious Purpose Truth in six words - more or less 1

Religious purpose; kill you and take your money.

christian take your money and kill a muslim, jew, buddhist ... other christians.
muslim take your money and kill a christian, buddhist, jew ... other muslims.
jew take your money and kill a buddist, christian, muslim ... other jews.
buddist take ... and kill ....

I do not believe in religion. I do not believe any dogmatist faux-prophet , desk-patriot politician, tyrant plutocrat ... welfare-corporatist ....

I will kill for Family, Friends, Ideals ..., but I will never kill for god, because it is safer to let god do the killing with the human standards of murder, starvation, greed, genocide, disease, exposure, cruelty, stupidity, dogma, lies ....

God did not do it or want it, but evil religious people, politicians/plutocrats, and institutional corporatist all love and lust to do it (murder/profit).

It's funny.  Laugh.

Journal Journal: I am becoming a target of the righteous 1

Again; I have been able to take a point from the corporate righteous of America.

It is a small victory, but it helps /. by depleting the righteousness lobbyist resources on /.

I wounder how many righteous lobbyist minions are on /. moderating to collect and then dispense points for the neo-righteous/corporatist agenda.

I know /. admin ain't involved, but maybe there is an organized group of users ... pushing a subversive agenda? I wonder, could they have an automated system slightly slanting content to trivia and downgrading /. folks that show independent or odd thoughts on /.?

Anyway, I always have a three-point to one advantage. I write for me ... rate me how you will. Look at my past years of post ... no change ... I think Bush killed 3000 USA Warriors by lying to Congress for a self-righteous neo-conservative agenda (I could be wrong). THANKS GOD he is now a lame-duck President.

!HAVEFUN! ... Reality is self induced hallucination. (%~o)

Editorial

Journal Journal: Standing up for what the Army should (and should not) be

I saw this article from a link on NPR. Since I don't know how long it will be available for and I think it's important enough to share (for those who are interested) I have posetd it here. Im my opinion, Joe Darby is a hero for stading up for what the Army should be: respecting the Geneva Convention, helping it treat others as it wants its POWs to be treated, and being an institution of honor by example:

I want to be proud of my country, but reading something like this shows me why some Vietnam Vets are having more incidents of PTSD: same s**t, different war.

I have provided the original URLs for those who want to see this stuff in its original format.
Thanks in advance for not suing me, NPR or GQ!

____________________
from - http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5651609

No longer restrained by a government gag order, the Army reservist who first told military investigators about photos of inmate abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison is speaking out.

Many of Sgt. Joseph Darby's former comrades from the 372nd Military Police Company have been sentenced to prison for their roles in the Abu Ghraib case. Darby, who will leave the Army at the end of August, cooperated with those prosecutions.

Prisoner abuse started at Abu Ghraib even before his unit arrived, Darby says. "Disgusted" by the now-infamous photographs, he decided to alert the Army's Criminal Investigation Division.

He says that he asked Army Specialist Charles Graner -- who is now serving a 10-year sentence for his role at Abu Ghraib -- for photographs of their time in Iraq that he could keep as mementos. One of the CDs Graner gave him contained the photos of the prisoner mistreatment.

His identity as the whistleblower was made public in May. When he returned to the United States, Darby was placed in protective custody.

Nonetheless, Darby says disclosing the abuse was "the right decision and it had to be made."

Darby's story will appear in the September issue of GQ magazine, which appears below.

from - http://men.style.com/gq/features/full?id=content_4785&pageNum=1

PRISONER OF CONSCIENCE
For the first time since exposing the atrocities at Abu Ghraib, Joe Darby speaks out

Everybody thinks there was a conspiracy at Abu Ghraib.

Everybody thinks there was an order from high up, or that somebody in command must have known. Everybody is wrong. Nobody in command knew about the abuse, because nobody in command cared enough to nd out. That was the real problem. The entire command structure was oblivious, living in their own little worlds. So it wasn't a conspiracy--it was negligence, plain and simple. They were all fucking clueless.

The general in charge of the prison was Janis Karpinski, but that didn't mean she was ever there. To actually lay eyes on Karpinski took an act of God. She spent all her time in Kuwait or in the Green Zone Palace. She kept her happy ass in the nice, safe places. The only time she'd come by was when a dignitary was visiting. She'd y in a half hour before they got there, get briefed, lead the tour, and then y back out. Other than that, she had no idea what was going on. She did nothing but suck dignitary ass. I guess she didn't like being in an overcrowded, violent prison with constant mortar re coming in. In the ve months I was at Abu Ghraib, I only saw her twice.

You have to understand, we were the most heavily mortared compound in Iraq. From the day we got there until the day I left, nobody took more mortars than we did. Nobody. We were taking them morning and night. It was just something you got used to. It became normal. After a while, we started having these surreal conversations while the mortars were ying. We'd hear the boom of the launch, and then we'd argue about what size it was while the shit was still coming in.

"What do you think that was? A sixty or an eighty?"

"Might have been a 120."

"No, it wasn't big enough to be a 120."

Other times, we'd hear the launch and start counting, just to see how far away it was. If you got to thirty before it blew, you knew they were 700 to a thousand meters away. But that's really all you could do--try to gure out where they were and what they were shooting at you. That, and get pissed off that nobody was shooting back.

The compound had a main prison, which was two stories high, a series of smaller prisons, an administrative building, and a small building called the Death Chamber. That's where Saddam used to torture his prisoners. There was a room with ceramic tile on the walls, oor, and ceiling so the blood would come off easily. Outside, there was a tent camp. That's where we housed the prisoners who'd committed normal crimes. Some of them were really minor offenses that would only get a two-month sentence, but they might be housed for three years while they waited for trial. The system was that backed up.

As long as the mortars landed on a building, it wasn't a big deal--they weren't powerful enough to pierce the roof. But if one landed in the yard or in the tent camp, it could do a lot of damage. Like, one night they got lucky and split our fuel tanker in half. Dropped a mortar right through it. It caused a re you could see for miles, probably 4,000 gallons of burning fuel. Another time, they dropped one in the middle of a prisoner prayer group. That was pretty bad. These guys had just been sitting in rows, facing Mecca and praying, when the mortar came in. We had fteen to sixteen dead and a bunch more wounded. We had to dig through the bodies, put them in body bags, and take them to the processing area to check them out of the prison. Whenever a prisoner was brought in, we would ID them with a retina scan and ngerprints, so when they died, we had to process them out the same way. Which meant that, for the rest of the day, we were digging through body bags looking for eyeballs. Sometimes there wasn't an eyeball we could use, so we'd look for a nger. You just had to tune it out. You couldn't let it get to you. You got numb.

But it catches up to you later, when you get home. Like, I slept ne while I was there, but now I have nightmares. And a few days before my unit left Abu Ghraib, all of a sudden people started worrying about mortar attacks for the rst time. It was weird. They'd be huddling against the wall together. I found myself crouched in a corner, praying. The numbness was wearing off. That's one of the things you have to keep in mind when you look at the pictures. We all got numb in different ways.

*****

I'll say this, too: The abuse started earlier than anybody realizes. Nobody has ever said that publicly, but there were things going on before our unit even got there. The day we arrived, back in October of 2003, we were getting a tour of the compound and we saw like fteen prisoners sitting in their cells in women's underwear. This was day one; nobody from our unit had ever set foot in the prison. We asked the MPs in charge--the Seventy-second, out of Las Vegas--why the prisoners were wearing panties. They told us that it was a corrective action, that these guys had been mortaring the compound. So probably the MPs decided to mess with these guys. This stuff was going on before we arrived. After we took over, it basically just escalated.

The other thing was, there were other government agencies who would come into the prison and handle prisoners. I can't say which agencies, but you can probably guess. Sometimes we didn't know exactly who they were. We'd get a call at like three in the morning from the battalion commander, saying, "You have a bird coming in. You need to take prisoner such and such from cell whatever to the landing zone in fteen minutes." So I'd put my gear on, cuff the prisoner, bag him, go to the LZ, wait for the helicopter to land, and then hand the prisoner off to the guys inside. I didn't know who they were. Didn't ask. When they tell you not to ask any questions, you don't ask questions. They might bring the prisoner back in a few hours, or the next morning, or two days later. You didn't ask. Other times, they would bring a new prisoner into the compound. You didn't know who they were, or who the prisoner was, or what he had done, or what they were going to do to him. You just handed over the cellblock. One night, this Black Hawk landed at about 4 a.m., and a couple guys came in with a prisoner and took him to tier 1, put sheets up so that nobody could see, and spent the rest of the night in there. They told us to stay away, so we did. Then a couple hours later, they came back out. They were like, "The prisoner is dead." They asked for ice to pack him, and then they said, "You guys clean this up. We weren't here. Have a good day." Got back on the bird and took off, left the dead body right there. Those guys can come in and kill a guy, and there's nothing you can do. There's no record of them. They were never there. They don't exist.

You've probably seen pictures of that prisoner with Graner and Harman crouching next to his dead body, giving the thumbs-up. Well, that's the guy. Everybody takes that picture at face value, but the truth is, Graner and Harman didn't kill him. And when something like that happens, it stretches the limits. Maybe Graner and Harman came away thinking, Okay, let's take it further.

*****

The earliest pictures were from October of 2003, but I didn't discover them until January of 2004. I found the pictures on a CD that Graner had given me. To this day, I'm not sure why he gave me that CD. He probably just forgot which pictures were on it, or he might have assumed that I wouldn't care. I was ipping through them, checking out pictures he had taken in Hilla, where we were stationed before Abu Ghraib, when all of a sudden these other pictures came up. And to be honest, at rst I thought they were pretty funny. I'm sorry, people can get mad at me if they want, but I'm not a Boy Scout. To me, that pyramid of naked Iraqis, when you rst see it, is hilarious. When it came up out of nowhere like that, I just laughed. I was like, "What the fuck?! I'm looking at a pyramid of asses!" But some of the other pictures didn't sit right with me. The ones of prisoners being beaten, or the one with a naked Iraqi sitting on his knees in front of another naked Iraqi, some of the more sexually-explicit-type stuff to humiliate the prisoners--it just didn't sit right with me. I couldn't stop thinking about it. After about three days, I made a decision to turn the pictures in. You have to understand: I'm not the kind of guy to rat somebody out. I've kept a lot of secrets for soldiers. In the heat of the moment, in a war, things happen. You do things you regret. I have exceeded the proper use of force myself a couple times. But this crossed the line to me. I had the choice between what I knew was morally right and my loyalty to other soldiers. I couldn't have it both ways.

I think the decision would have been harder if they had been different soldiers. But most of these soldiers I had doubts about already. Like Sabrina Harman. She was a piece of shit from the day I met her. Before we ever got to Abu Ghraib, when we were still in Hilla, she had this kitten for three days when a dog came and killed it. So Harman decided to dissect it. She said there were no marks on the outside, so she dissected it and found some ruptured organs or something. And then she decided to mummify it. She tried different methods, but all she ended up with was the head. A damned mummied cat's head, for Christ's sake. This rotted-out head with pebbles for eyes. She stuck it on top of a soda can and carried it around with her everywhere. I didn't give a rat's ass what happened to her. I just tried to avoid her. Or Ivan Frederick, the noncommissioned officer in charge of the night shift. He and I avoided each other, too. We didn't get along. Or Charles Graner. He and I got along, but we weren't friends. Graner is one of those guys, he's got an overpowering aura about him. People just like him. But if you see the other side, you understand that he's not someone you want to get too close to. He's manipulative. He has multiple personalities. He can be this religious guy, talking about God and the way things are supposed to be done, but he's also got this very, very dark, evil side. We were talking in Hilla one time, before we got to Abu Ghraib. I'd been walking around smoking a cigarette, and he was working the gate to our compound, so I was talking to him for like ten minutes, and he was telling me about when he thought his wife was cheating on him. He said that he found himself across the street from their house, up on a hill, with a loaded rie trained on the door, just waiting for them to come out. I said, "What happened?" and he said, "They never came out."

When I turned the pictures in, that's the story that stuck with me. Because I knew what this guy was capable of.

*****

I always wanted to stay anonymous. At rst, I didn't even give my name to the Criminal Investigation Division. I just burned a copy of the pictures onto a CD, typed an anonymous letter, put them in a manila envelope, and handed them to an agent at CID. I said, "This was left in my office," and walked out. But about an hour later, this little short guy named Special Agent Pieron came to my office and started grilling me about where the pictures came from. It took him about half an hour before I gave it up. I said, "Fine, I had the pictures. I'm the one who put them in there." I said, "I'll talk to you after work."

I still didn't think it would be as big a deal as it turned out to be. I thought they would be taken off duty and tried, but I didn't think the world would ever hear about it. I never thought it would explode the way it did.

So after work, I went to Agent Pieron's office, scrolled through the pictures with him, and gave a sworn statement. A few of the soldiers in the pictures he knew, but I identied the rest and told him where the pictures were taken, that kind of thing. But while I was doing it, another CID agent was actually going out and rounding these people up. They worked too fast. They were picking them up while I was still there! So I'm in the back room, and I start to hear voices and people's gear coming off out front. I knew right away whose voices they were. It was Graner, Ambuhl, and England. I looked at Agent Pieron, and I didn't have to say anything. He grabbed the other agent and said, "He's still in here. He is still here."

There was only one way out of the room, so there was basically no way to sneak by. One of the agents went and grabbed all of these blankets and rugs and covered me up with them, made me look like a really tall woman in some kind of ridiculous outt. Then he told everyone in the room to turn around and face the wall, and they led me out the door and down the corridor and outside. I couldn't see anything; they had to guide me. I was scared as hell.

*****

The next two days, there was a lot of tension and anger in the unit. My rst sergeant and my company commander knew what I'd done, and they had a big problem with it. They were pissed that I hadn't come to them rst. But the problem was, in the past, every time something came to them, it got covered up. The track record left me no choice. We had a drug addict in the unit getting prescription drugs. He actually walked out of a military hospital and jumped into an Iraqi cab and took a hundred-mile trek to Hilla. They did nothing. There were other things, too, that I'm not going to mention. But things happened, and nothing was done about it. Plus, Frederick was involved--he was in charge of the night shift for the prison, and he was in the damned photos.

For about three days, Graner and England and the rest of them were being questioned. Then it got even worse. Someone decided to keep them on the compound. I had expected them to be charged and taken away, but no, they were going to get new jobs. They'd be walking around with their weapons all day long, knowing that somebody had turned them in and trying to nd out who.

That was one of the most nervous periods of my life. I was constantly scared. I started getting paranoid. I kept my gun with me at all times. I took it to sleep with me. All the other platoons in my company slept in one of the old prison buildings on the compound, in cells, but I slept in a closet in an old administration building, so I was one of the only soldiers who didn't have a big metal door that I could close. In fact, there wasn't any door at all. I was totally exposed. I hung a poncho in the doorway, like an army raincoat, and I would lie there in bed with both arms behind my head and my left hand inside the pillowcase, gripping my nine-millimeter with the safety off. I would just listen. And about four days into it, I'm lying there, and I hear the poncho go swish. I was like, Holy shit--somebody is coming into my goddamn room. And then it was quiet again. I'm thinking, Oh fuck. I tighten my grip around my weapon, and then I feel a hand on my foot. So I swing up with the nine as fast as I can and grab the guy by the shoulder, and he goes, "Jesus Christ!" It was my friend Layton, completely blasted. He just wanted some help with his computer. Thank God he didn't remember in the morning that I had pulled a gun on him. I don't think he would've realized why I had the gun, but Layton was the type of guy that wouldn't have let me forget it. He would've teased me about it, and somebody else might have heard the story and put it together.

The day after that, I was working at my office in the Operations building when Graner came in. You could tell he hadn't slept, he's all unshaven and everything, and he's still got his weapon--an M16 with a grenade launcher. Takes it off and sets it on the desk. He just looks exhausted, and he's acting funny. He's talking to my boss, Sergeant Coville, but he keeps looking at me. At one point, he says to Coville, "You don't know who your friends are." And then he looks at me and says, "Do you, Darb?" I froze. But then he just laughed and started talking again, and I realized then that he didn't know. He trusted me enough to believe it wasn't me.

Eventually, after about a month, somebody nally had the sense to take them off the compound. That was a huge relief, but I still wanted to make sure nobody found out what I'd done. One of the things you have to understand is the mentality of where I grew up, in western Maryland. It's a small town, and there's not a lot of work. So most people are either in the military, in the Reserves, or they're related to somebody who is. They're good people, but I knew they weren't going to look at the fact that these guys were beating up prisoners. They were going to look at the fact that an American soldier put other American soldiers in prison. For Iraqis. And to those people--who basically are patriotic, socially programmed people who believe whatever they're told--the Iraqis are the enemy, and screw whatever happens to them. So I knew if I wanted to go back to my civilian life, if I wanted to integrate back home, nobody could know what I'd done. They'd never forgive me. And I was assured by the army that nobody would know. I would remain anonymous.

Well, it didn't work out that way. About a month after Graner and the rest of them left Abu Ghraib, we were up in Camp Anaconda, and I was sitting with ten other guys from my platoon in the dining facility. It's a big facility, packed with like 400 other soldiers, and I'm sitting there eating when Donald Rumsfeld comes on during the damned congressional hearings. It was like something out of a movie. I'm sitting there, and right next to me there's a TV, and Rumsfeld is on it when he drops my damned name. Almost nobody in my unit knew what I'd done until he dropped my damned name. On national TV. I was sitting midbite when he said it, and I was like, Oh, my God. And the guys at the table just stopped eating and looked at me. I was like, Fuuuuuck. And I got up and got the hell out of there.

*****

After my name got out, I knew I had to get home. The media was swarming all over the house like vultures. They were taking pictures every time my wife came in and out, the phone was ringing nonstop, and they were coming to the door one after the other with presents and owers, even after she told them to go away. Most of the neighbors didn't support her, either. Some did, like the postmaster--he's a Vietnam vet, and he told my wife that he understood. But as soon as somebody else walked in, even he stopped talking to her. Because a lot of people up there view me as a traitor. Even some of my family members think I'm a traitor. One of my uncles does, and he convinced my brother not to talk to me anymore. So my wife had to hide in a relative's house, and when the media tracked her there, she had to be taken into military custody. I still have a lot of bad feelings toward the press.

I was stuck in Iraq, powerless to help her. I needed to get home. I asked for emergency leave, and at one o'clock in the morning they came to my room with a two-hour warning. They said, "Get out of bed, get what you need, turn in your ak vest. You're getting out of the country." So I grabbed everything I could t into two duffel bags, gave my weapons to a friend, and went down to wait for the plane. It's a long ight, and I managed to sleep for most of it. Finally, we land in Dover, Delaware. We're taxiing on the runway when all of a sudden, the plane stops. You can hear the hissing of the hydraulics, and the plane door is opening up. But we're still on the runway. The loadmaster of the plane looks at me and says, "What the hell are we doing?" And then these three guys in suits come on, and they point at me and they're like, "Let's go."

There was a van sitting there on the runway, and I was saluted by a colonel, who said, "Your family's waiting. We'll take you to them." I couldn't believe it when I walked through the doors and saw my wife. I had no idea she was actually going to be in the airport. I was just hugging her and crying. Then they took us to a house on the post for the night, and after a while, I went outside to talk to Major Chung, the provost marshal for my unit based in Cumberland. He asked me what I wanted to do, and I said, "I just want to go home." And he said, "You can't go home. You can probably never go home."

*****

He was right. I never went back to my home. I've only been back to my town twice: for my mother's funeral and for a wedding. Even then, I was only in town as long as I needed to be. I'm not welcome there. People there don't look at the fact that I knew right from wrong. They look at the fact that I put an Iraqi before an American. So we've relocated, and I've been working as a military mechanic for the past two years. My orders were extended through the trials, so I have now served ten years on an eight-year contract. My last day in the military is August 31. I'm done. I have a job lined up, working for a medical-equipment company. It's a nice job, a lucrative job. At rst it might be hard for me to adapt to civilian life. You hear this from everybody who's out of the military--if you're a supervisor over a civilian, you can't bark at them like you do in the military, so you have to learn to do things different. I always treated my soldiers well, but if I wanted something done, it better be done now. It'll be different in civilian life.

But I don't regret any of it. I made my peace with my decision before I turned the pictures in. I knew that if people found out it was me, I wouldn't be liked. That's why I wanted to be anonymous. I knew what the mentality is up there. But the only time I have ever regretted it was when I was in Iraq and my family was going through a lot. Other than that, I never doubted that it was the right thing. It forced a big change in my life, but the change has been good and bad. I liked my little quiet town, but now I have a new place, with a new job and new opportunities. And I'm going to live my life like anyone else, and raise my family.

User Journal

Journal Journal: The PirateBay Sinks on May 31st, 2006. 3

Most visitors to the Piratebay.org today were in for a surprise. U.S. Newswire (http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=66667) reports that on May 31st, 2006, the MPAA and its allies finally succeded in getting The Pirate Bay (http://thepiratebay.org/), taken offline. "Since filing a criminal complaint in Sweden in November 2004, the film industry has worked vigorously with Swedish and U.S. government officials in Sweden to shut this (illegal) site down. Over 50 Swedish law enforcement officials executed search warrants and raids at 10 different locations which resulted in three arrests and the preclusion of millions of users trading up to 2 million (illegal) files simultaneously."

According to Alexa.com, which rates millions of Web sites around the world, "The Pirate Bay" was the 479th most visited Web site in the world, ranking 21st in Sweden and 312th in the U.S. In comparison, CNN.com is the 125th most popular site in Sweden. With more than one million hits per day, the popular P2P haven took in an estimated $60,000 per month from advertisers in addition to thousands of dollars collected from user donations.

The article, being mostly a news release from the MPAA, has a predictable point of view, but being this early on in the game, few other sources were avaialble to cover the takedown. The aticle proudly states, "By shutting down Razorback2 and sites like 'The Pirate Bay,' the ease with which pirates can obtain illegal content online can be slowed dramatically." While this last assertion is debatable, one thing is certain: ThePiratebay.org has sailed its last Black Flag. Aaargh.

User Journal

Journal Journal: New York Times Weigh in (again) on Net Neutrality

In their second Op-Ed piece in less than a month on the subject (as reported by Savetheinternet.com), The New York Times' (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/28/opinion/28sun3.html)
Adam Cohen provides a wonderful argument in favor of neutrality on the World Wide Web. Cohen succinctly provides a brief history of the world wide web, it's creator Tim Berners-Lee vision of how it should operate, why he designed that way, and the forces moving to create a tiered pricing system of access. From stifling creativity and competition to free speech and innovation, Cohen shows why strange bedfellows have come to favor enforcing the 'Democratic Ethic' of the internet by Legislation. Readers will come away with a good nutshell argument about why Net Neutrality is important and the potential consequences of not forcing current standards to remain in place.

Coveniently provided at the end of the article is a link to Savetheinternet.com (http://savetheinternet.com/) where United States readers can write an email to their Senators and Congresspersons in favor of pending Net Neutraility legislation in the U.S. House and Senate.

In case this article gets buried in the NYTimes archives, here is the text of the article (Thanks in advance for not suing me, NYTimes!):

Editorial Observer
Why the Democratic Ethic of the World Wide Web May Be About to End

By ADAM COHEN
Published: May 28, 2006

The World Wide Web is the most democratic mass medium there has ever been. Freedom of the press, as the saying goes, belongs only to those who own one. Radio and television are controlled by those rich enough to buy a broadcast license. But anyone with an Internet-connected computer can reach out to a potential audience of billions.

This democratic Web did not just happen. Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the British computer scientist who invented the Web in 1989, envisioned a platform on which everyone in the world could communicate on an equal basis. But his vision is being threatened by telecommunications and cable companies, and other Internet service providers, that want to impose a new system of fees that could create a hierarchy of Web sites. Major corporate sites would be able to pay the new fees, while little-guy sites could be shut out.

Sir Tim, who keeps a low profile, has begun speaking out in favor of "net neutrality," rules requiring that all Web sites remain equal on the Web. Corporations that stand to make billions if they can push tiered pricing through have put together a slick lobbying and marketing campaign. But Sir Tim and other supporters of net neutrality are inspiring growing support from Internet users across the political spectrum who are demanding that Congress preserve the Web in its current form.

The Web, which Sir Tim invented as a scientist at CERN, the European nuclear physics institute, is often confused with the Internet. But like e-mail, the Web runs over the system of interconnected computer networks known as the Internet. Sir Tim created the Web in a decentralized way that allowed anyone with a computer to connect to it and begin receiving and sending information.

That open architecture is what has allowed for the extraordinary growth of Internet commerce and communication. Pierre Omidyar, a small-time programmer working out of his home office, was able to set up an online auction site that anyone in the world could reach -- which became eBay. The blogging phenomenon is possible because individuals can create Web sites with the World Wide Web prefix, www, that can be seen by anyone with Internet access.

Last year, the chief executive of what is now AT&T sent shock waves through cyberspace when he asked why Web sites should be able to "use my pipes free." Internet service providers would like to be able to charge Web sites for access to their customers. Web sites that could not pay the new fees would be accessible at a slower speed, or perhaps not be accessible at all.

A tiered Internet poses a threat at many levels. Service providers could, for example, shut out Web sites whose politics they dislike. Even if they did not discriminate on the basis of content, access fees would automatically marginalize smaller, poorer Web sites.

Consider online video, which depends on the availability of higher-speed connections. Internet users can now watch channels, like BBC World, that are not available on their own cable systems, and they have access to video blogs and Web sites like YouTube.com, where people upload videos of their own creation. Under tiered pricing, Internet users might be able to get videos only from major corporate channels.

Sir Tim expects that there are great Internet innovations yet to come, many involving video. He believes people at the scene of an accident -- or a political protest -- will one day be able to take pictures with their cellphones that could be pieced together to create a three-dimensional image of what happened. That sort of innovation could be blocked by fees for the high-speed connections required to relay video images.

The companies fighting net neutrality have been waging a misleading campaign, with the slogan "hands off the Internet," that tries to look like a grass-roots effort to protect the Internet in its current form. What they actually favor is stopping the government from protecting the Internet, so they can get their own hands on it.

But the other side of the debate has some large corporate backers, too, like Google and Microsoft, which could be hit by access fees since they depend on the Internet service providers to put their sites on the Web. It also has support from political groups of all persuasions. The president of the Christian Coalition, which is allied with Moveon.org on this issue, recently asked, "What if a cable company with a pro-choice board of directors decides that it doesn't like a pro-life organization using its high-speed network to encourage pro-life activities?"

Forces favoring a no-fee Web have been gaining strength. One group, Savetheinternet.com, says it has collected more than 700,000 signatures on a petition. Last week, a bipartisan bill favoring net neutrality, sponsored by James Sensenbrenner, Republican of Wisconsin, and John Conyers Jr., Democrat of Michigan, won a surprisingly lopsided vote in the House Judiciary Committee.

Sir Tim argues that service providers may be hurting themselves by pushing for tiered pricing. The Internet's extraordinary growth has been fueled by the limitless vistas the Web offers surfers, bloggers and downloaders. Customers who are used to the robust, democratic Web may not pay for one that is restricted to wealthy corporate content providers.

"That's not what we call Internet at all," says Sir Tim. "That's what we call cable TV."

Slashdot Top Deals

"By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to suspect "Hungry." -- a Larson cartoon

Working...