Which is true.
Can't be possible. Your original claim was pretty adamant that all issues are the fault of user and to quote you "it's never the tool". If a tool is poorly-made then it means that it is not the fault of the wielder if they can't get the job done using a faulty tool.
or *have* little ability, that is.
It's never the tool, but the wielder. Give a process to a good engineer, and he will find a way to get things to work. Give any process to a code monkey, and you are just going to get a lot of shit flinging irregardless of the process of choice.
Then you haven't been in software development for very long or how little ability to discern a good tool from a bad one. Shitty tools are foisted upon software developers all the time in the form of buggy and/or poorly documented frameworks, databases, IDEs, etc.
ClanLib also only supports Linux and Windows whereas SDL, Unity and Unreal support OS X, mobile OSes and, at least Unreal, HTML5 targeting.
But...but...they were mentioned in an 8-year-old book on C++ game programming. Unity and Unreal better be quaking in their boots!
Yeah, it's definitely "fresh and new". As in having over 2000 of its own "fresh and new" issues. All Servo has done is trade one set of bugs with its own set.
Google will help us fully realize our vision of the conscious home and allow us to change the world faster than we ever could if we continued to go it alone.
Said the NSA Director who absolutely loves the new surveillance avenues these devices will open up.
Cool spinmeistering, brah. But all I hear is someone making up excuses for why Ubuntu phone will have less developers and fewer apps than even Windows Phone. And that's no small accomplishment.
OpenBSD is what I obviously meant.
And to head off the obvious rejoinder, yes, their private key can be compromised to allow an attacker to sign malicious packages. But if that is a genuine concern, why would you possibly trust the security of the SSL connection to their site?
If this doesn't need some way to ensure that I really connect with it instead of an intercepting mitm that injects its own version, what does?
In what universe do you live in that SSL prevents a MITM attack? MITM attacks exist in order to allow an attacker to monitor and modify your supposedly "secure" connections. You ensure that what you downloaded is what you meant to download by using the signify utility as mentioned on the page and verify that the package you download was signed by the OpenSSL devs.
That's funny, I didn't realize that programs such as Autocad, Autodesk Sketchbook, Pixelmator, Adobe Lightroom, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Pinnacle Studio, etc. were for consuming content. They seem to be for creating content to me. That isn't even scratching the surface of all the content creation apps that exist for iOS.
No, it's a grammar issue. Breath is a noun. So "to breath" is grammatically incorrect.
Exactly. This guy lives in some sort of bizarro world Rubyist bubble. Sure, there is probably some guy's toy project to use Ruby in some sort of faux embedded environment, but that hardly matches what is done by the actual people writing the software.
IP address != person
Maybe in less than 1% of cases. All the rest of the time, the only one using the IP address is the person who pays for the internet access.
So it's reasonable anonymous if you consider your identity.
It's only reasonable if you think shoving your head in the sand gives you reasonably anonymity.
"If you want to know what happens to you when you die, go look at some dead stuff." -- Dave Enyeart
