We can drop all of the arguments about GMO here.
What you want amounts to censorship
Again, I repeat this argument. If information is good and should not be censored, then you would be okay with a law requiring companies to say whether or not any black people touched the food? Some people might want that information, and who are you to deny it.
And before you go on with some bullshit about there's no reason that would matter, there's equally no reason why a food being a GM crop would matter. Furthermore, even if it somehow mattered, the consumer can't possibly know how, or to what extent. It's like a 4 year old reason a cereal box label. Almost no one understands genetics, biochemistry, or even what a molecule is in a non-scifi capacity. It's information that can't possibly be used to help people.
The "truth" about a food includes whether genetically-modified organisms were involved in producing it.
You're right. And whether or not brown people have touched my food is also part of that "truth". After all, you can't prove there's no such thing as "nigger cooties". And the customer has the right to know if any minority has been involved in the production of their food. It's just information right?
It's information that the average consumer can't possibly know what to do with. They (and almost everyone who will read this page) has absolutely no understanding of plant biology or nutrition. They will only see it as some kind of health warning, even if there's no reason why that might be the case. It's ridiculous fear-mongering and you all need to stop pretending that this is a concern about health rather than a concern about a specific business that produces some GM foods. It's the same thing the environmental extremists do - disguise anti-corporatism as environmental responsibility.
Love makes the world go 'round, with a little help from intrinsic angular momentum.