Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:No secret in academia (Score 1) 408

This seems quite complicated! The right way to do stuff is to first do it, and write your hypothesis afterwards according to your results. The same goes for engineering: you make the product, and then write the specification. Otherwise you would be wrong / request for deviation too often, and that would be depressing!

Comment Re:Probably lost the sale, too! (Score 5, Insightful) 339

Actually, no; we count on people who designed a rocket launcher the proper way (read: under pressure during the cold war) many years ago, and nowadays they don't know how to do it anymore. This is one of the reasons why the modifications to the Soyuz rocket launcher were kept to a strict minimum before launching it from Kourou: they wanted to keep as much as possible the old design that we know worked quite well.

Comment Re:Whats interesting to me is (Score 1) 370

You sir, have a very peculiar definition of your friends... As people I know started to sign up and use telephone services more and more, I started getting less and less letters from them. Now I only get letters from a few of them. Don't get me wrong, its not a bad thing as it lets me know who my real friends are!

Comment One week? (Score 1) 97

I am surprised. I don't remember very well what were the launch windows for LEO orbits, so this might not be applicable... But for GTO orbits, it was either one or two days of delay if there was a minor preparation glitch on the launcher, or something like one month if a new flight software had to be generated and qualified... Anyone knows more about this?
Censorship

Submission + - Google helped with CISPA,quietly worked with the bill's authors behind the scene (zdnet.com)

suraj.sun writes: One spark of hope to the people and organizations that oppose cyberspying bill CISPA was that in the list of 28 corporate sponsors (including Facebook), Google was nowhere to be seen. But now CISPA’s author Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) has bragged that Google had, in fact, quietly worked with the bill’s authors behind the scenes. According to Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and number-one fan for the execution of Wikileaks whisteblower Bradley Manning — Google is “very supportive” of CISPA.

CISPA has been nicknamed “SOPA 2 but is more accurately described as a setup to wipe out decades of consumer privacy protections, giving the US government unprecedented access to individuals’ online data and communications. Now it seems we know where Google stands, too. The bill primarily protects internet companies that share private data and communications with the government — it promotes digital spying on citizens without a warrant under the guise of cybersecurity. The bill’s vague language, in addition to the power it can give Homeland Security entities involved in domain shutdowns to go after sites such as Wikileaks, has had CISPA labeled as a relative to SOPA and PIPA.

Slashdot Top Deals

Computer Science is merely the post-Turing decline in formal systems theory.

Working...