It's already the case. It's called a CFC, or Controlled Foreign Corporation and it is taxed exactly as it if is a US owned/based corporation.
However the taxes paid by foreign individuals in foreign countries is the responsibility of the those individuals, not the corporation. Just as it is the US. It is also the reality is the corporation isn't replacing their us workforce with 1-1 skilled people (at least not at the outset) they are replacing 1 for 10 outsourced and still spending less.
Heck I could try the same thing without going over seas. How about I replace my IC designer with 10 recent graduates. Should I pay the same FICA for the 10 graduates, am I really cheating the IRS? What if my IC designer wasn't 'in-sourced' but died (bus, heart attack, whatever)?
Frankly large companies that do stupid stuff *should* be eliminated. The normal course is bankruptcy and liquidation.
If 10 recent graduates can do the same job and still cost less then I say have at it. Of course I think they can't and I charge accordingly.

Had a few this weekend but I think you peeps don't really understand world finance. Simple fact is that the US isn't even close to competitive in the world market when it comes to finance, holding earnings, inventment in r&d, and running a corporation.
The real solution is to end corporate welfare (fat fsck'ing chance) and lowering the effective tax burden to 20% or less -- the competition is at 10% effective flat taxation.
In reality there is no flat tax jurisdiction. Even HK is tax free for your first 16000 USD (single) 30000 USD (with dependent) and there is *no* VAT or sales tax on top.
As a comparison the US tax rate starts at 5000 (federal) + state tax + city tax + property tax + with state sales tax (3-10% for most of the country). For most of the software writing and hardware designing workforce we are at 50+% effective tax burden. So at the end of the day a US citizen/resident is so tax burdened our 'socialist' neighbors [Canada, Europe] are taxed far less than us, of course many of them can't make the same raw income numbers ... but it's what we can spend that counts, right?
Now Asia where taxation is still sane ... how to compete? Yeah, I know, most of us are running around with the wacky ideas that Asia hasn't changed in 30 (or 50) years, but it has. The infrustructure, wealth and ideas in Asia today leave the US hard pressed to compete on a level playing field. And it's not a level playing field. The US is behind on just about everything but work ethinc. We work 80 hard hours when Asia sit's on their collective ass for 50-60 of those same hours. And that's it. We charge 100x more for 3-5x the productivity and that just doesn't balance out at the end of the day.
Of course in most of Asia I can maintain my standarnd of living (or better) for 1/3 of the income (which comes to 10x the income for 10x the productivity) works out. Unfortunatly the tax reverses the mess so now I make 5x the wage for 10x the productivity. Ouch.
There are many ways to slice and dice the mess; I see it as:
  - kill corporate welfare
  - drop the effective tax burden
  - drop the entitlement programs
  - restore competition.
If we do it on our schedule it will be much less painful that when it is done when we have no choice. The list really isn't optional, it will happen in less than 10 years. period. no choices. if we do it intentionally then the middle class will retain some wealth and/or maintain it's existance.
I honestly believe that the middle class the the US is doomed because we/they don't, won't or can't exercise the power to push this agenda forward.

China Airlines is the Taiwan carrier.
The LAX/TPE plane is good. The SFO/TPE (as of last year) was junk interior: old, worn, no entertainment.

I've not heard anything good about Air China, the China carrier. Garuda, the Indonesia carrier, is pretty much like a US domestic flight, really bad for Asia. Cathay, the Hong Kong carrier, can be hit or miss ... HKG/CDG as of 2 years ago really doesn't meet the standard of most Asian carriers, IMO.

My number one least favorite flight is Northwest (now Delta) MSP/NRT.

My number one favorite flight is Singapore Air ANYWHERE. Nobody even comes close to Singapore in economy class, it's only a couple inches of seat from business class on most other airlines (power plugs, entertainment, service - everything is top notch there).

Note, my comments are all pertain to Economy class. For myself when I fly business class I don't see so much difference between the airlines. Yeah Singapore is still tops but the difference between them is pretty minimal.

One last thing, flying business class within the EU seems pretty pointless. The only bump is a higher ratio of flight attendants an a guarantee that the middle seat is empty. I just don't get that one.

Because return of the cover is used as 'proof of no sale' which allows the retailer to claim the publisher and get credit against further purchases from said publisher.

Heck yeah. This was a really good one.
Too bad the sequels/series were done to such a low standard.

s/loose/lose/

Reminds me of Crypto AG.