This therefore excuses the guys comment that he makes a valid point as i also have and get modded to hell and bad karma's to hell?

NO really i end up logging out so i can make 2 more posts before having to go away for a day....
the sites done for period.

Have a nice day , ya know instead of banning those MS jerks you allow them to gang up and mod everyone worthy to leave , that worked out well.

made sure win 7 64 bit was on i t not win 8
in fact i stayed right clear of any win 8 pc's for sale.

a russian tank with a cat seat

i dunno start asking the other you

ROFL
hahahaha

your boned cause the boot record is locked ot only allow winodws 8
SMART move exlax....

1 GB data cap and a cost of 399.99/month and you have to sign up for a trillion years ....
who cares its does none of us any good with the restrictive long term copyright crap...
it snot like anyone on the net is gonna be needing bandwidth unless your pirating right?

oh joy
time to teach stupid a lesson

and hten you have to show up ill come by myself and guess what you needing a lawyer means you just spent nearly 3-4 grand
and even if you win 5K
on disability the most you can take form me is 50$ a month
in other words you have to sue a lot of people ot make it worth it and do it class action wise ergo 80 or so to barely break even
and they like targeting the poor and disadvantaged the 50$ rule was placed for this very reason....to not harm the person overtly....
funny how that works...

welfare people its only 25$ so really not worth it
so you get friends pay a guy to get net access on welfare and if he ever gets nailed no one is really out much for ever and 200 months to pay it back is hilarious and the seocnd time you can just add 200 more months and so on ya cant take more ten the 25 or 50

so all the laws in the land cant mess with that...you change this and it will mean heavy handed overpayment rules be changed
and doing that your gonna see an uptake in crime as those not into downloading suddenly get boiinked for more cash then rent wont have a home and thus will steal to make ends meet

so changing that law wont help no one either...
remember the poorest people spend 100% of there incomes in the community
rich people put it in a bank and it don't do anything for you or the nation.
this is why i call hollywood economic terrorists.

nope im gonna take those and more now that i saved downloading everything free and like i said i broke this

  lil spill yesterday
and the fct is on disability the max at once you can get from me is 50 dollars...

price of download free
cost of internet 61$
price of hollywood lawyers suing you for 50$ a month at 500$ a hour ....priceless....
(up to max of 5000$)

those poor welfare and disability people the max one can take off a check is 25/month on welfare and 50 on disability so youd have to literally sue everyone at once ot make your payments to a lawyer...
the only people they will go after is you min wage garnishable suckers

i say unto you hollystupid go fuckin try to sue me i guarantee you the court cost will be more then 5 grand
and ill hshare every whay i know how to make you pay in court
NOT to mention preying on us disabled well the msot maybe 5 grand but at once you can only get 50$ a month so all those lawyers fees you better want to wait for it.

remember if i pay a levy which was in effect a lisence to do private copying and you change the law such that i have to buy a blank cdr and pay that levy and then get fined and have a record of up to 5000$
section one of the charter of rights and freedoms states:
YOU need to look at the Oakes test....
The test is applied once the claimant has proven that one of the provisions of the Charter has been violated. The onus is on the Crown to pass the Oakes test.

you have one law BLANK MEDIA LEVY and then violate my right to privacy and security by adding a new one that penalizes me after in good faith i have paid already.

as the CRIA now music canada has asked for and received when it asked for increases ot said levy and not more....then one can argue that the fillowing needs to be proved in order that section one oakes test be passed.

There must be a pressing and substantial objective
The means must be proportional
The means must be rationally connected to the objective
There must be minimal impairment of rights
There must be proportionality between the infringement and objective.

you affectivly impair the following rights with this case.
Without a warrant they have passed private data to a court , thus say if i have downloaded music and placed onto blank cdrs paying said levy

one could argue such laws that contrary themselves are unfair and violate section seven fo the charter and the fundamental principals of justice.

and if you read section 7 you will see various "angles"
like Arbitrariness
It is a principle of fundamental justice that laws should not be arbitrary. (R. v. Malmo-Levine) That is, the state cannot limit an individual's rights where "it bears no relation to, or is inconsistent with, the objective that lies behind [it]"

in effect you dont make a copyright levy have every forced to pay it , and then stuff a 5000 dollar fine and the stress involved which is another violation of section seven

there is the right to security of the person, which consists of rights to privacy of the body and its health[9] and of the right protecting the "psychological integrity" of an individual. That is, the right protects against significant government-inflicted harm (stress) to the mental state of the individual.

thats my interpretation of it.

you've already got a media levy , you then add all this to things and add the stress and violations of privacy by a NON GOVERNMENT entity and you actually think all this is legal and some judge already let them enter the evidence?

its a joke. The major factor here while there may be other laws that aren't major that conflict they are not going to affect large sections of the populace.

someone has edited and removed portions of the wiki that showed a part that dealt with this specifically and i bet this is why so ill do the research with the actual charter and get back to you

but i'm positive you cant make laws that contradict each other especially on purpose it may happen now and then in minor bits but this is like double dipping and what not...
they already get levy money i'd make the challenge they should not get or be entitled to any more.
and then id go through the rings of what distribution of a record to s tore would cost and then once that is removed show in past they would be lucky to give about a dime per disk to an artist and they get 27 cents now per blank....

Then there is the aspects of violations of the strict privacy laws of Canada nad our fraud laws that entail how they obtained without out legal means to obtain data on these 50 people....only two ways to know one is using bittorrent , be in the swarm , or port scanning....
both ways your not law enforcement so committing the illegal act of sharing it out is in itself not legal and thus your breach of law in obtaining said data is also in and of itself should not have been admissible.

IN fact it is possible a judge can via those terrorist laws allow for say a police officer or RCMP or other law enforcement person(s) to breech law in the move to catch a criminal....

These guys aren't law enforcement ....
and i'd push hard on section of the charter that dont inviolate other rights like 2(b) 7, fundamental justice not being served....and then section 8: unreasonable search and seizure....
section 7 one might look also at the private copyblank media levy
then say
Overbreadth
The "Principles of Fundamental Justice" require that means used to achieve a societal purpose or objective must be reasonably necessary.
This principle is violated when the government, in pursuing a "legitimate objective", uses "means" that unnecessarily and disproportionately interfere with an individual's rights. they will make me pay the levy then fine me ....almost sounds like a charge for section 12 cruel and unusual punishment ....

take my money and then beat up in court and take WAYYYY more then you were before....
  ya know that oakes test thingy....i pay 26.7 cents per blank cdr suddenly im liable for 5 grand after having paid that ....
not fair not just...

and someone has literally completely rewritten the wiki pages in less then a few months ....tons a missing data now....

yes it will when i say the most you can get is 50$ per month ( on disability and that is the law also )and that ill make sure i make you show up a few times in court so those lawyers fees are pricey
you go right on and ill download everything i can and once you sue you cant come back for more as ive been hit for it
you cant sue me for the same thing twice after all....
so you show up and start the case ill call 20 witnesses over 3 days and that alone insures your spending nearly 5000
you still cant get more then 5000
so guess what enjoy......

the most they can get is 5 grand so download a million download everything once and guess what
5 grand is all they get
its the law
so if i avg that over every game , ebook, application HECK 3dsmax is 8000 bucks new LOL
movie and tv ep
guess what they can have 50$ a month for 100 months ( thats most any judgement against me can have legally )
and to tell you i lived on 600/month for 8 years and now am given 990 /month so take 50 and guess what fuck teuk tuck whoopty do da

not to mention that lawyers cost money and when i show up and drag it on as much as i can
each day costs them 3 grand and the max on me is still 5 grand...
NO MATTER WHAT....hahahahahahahahahaha this is why they was screaming and the RCMP said they wont go after any downloaders so whom is come come get me other then this way....small claims = max 25 grand normally till you apply this law its max 5 grand for all....