Do you really think a substantial fraction of the voters care about program, politics or the past?
Hillary is a good choice if want to vote for someone whose name starts with an H because the "H" brings you good luck.
Remember that your vote counts just as much as the vote of the average youtube/facebook/twitter comment writer.
If I find a murdered body while jogging, I am probably going to be one of the initial suspects. I will be questioned by officers, and possibly even called back to the precinct if they have further questions. This would absolutely inconvenience me, but I would be a real jackass if I put up a stink about it. Someone was just murdered, which would be a much bigger problem than me losing a couple afternoons.
And it is of the outmost importance that you keep the freedom to make that choice.
Clearly the entire community of Gigaom upvoted the news piece.
Apparently, on slow news days you can bypass the firehose with about 15 votes.
It depends on the delivery method.
If it's, for example, cyanide in your coffee, it wouldn't.
On the other hand, if it's a large barrel of cyanide catapulted in your general direction, it's assault. (It you fail your dodge roll, it's also battery)
Why carry pilots instead of an AI?
If it's just for bragging about the capacity for dead weight, they could have chosen other forms for it. Like, a large pig with a funny hat. Or 150Kg worth of penguins.
Welcome to Jazzdot's gaps. It's the news you don't read that matter.
What about guanine and adenine?
"the three basic components of life" is misleading, more like "three of the basic components of life"
The chief component is cytosine... cytosine and guanine.
And with God you mean Ananke, right. I mean... It's pretty clear this one's hers. The entire result conforms to her modus operandi.
This happened thousands of years before the Genesis. You need to read the bible more carefully.
And we shouldn't make plans for tomorrow, because how can we even know there will be a tomorrow? After all, today and all days prior are not at all "tomorrow-like".
The fact that one side moves forward doesn't, by itself, give that side an advantage
It certainly does when one side holds the power of coercive authority. You can't actually win against coercive authority. You can try to circumvent it, but you can never defeat it, because the advantage of coercion is absolute.
Which, as we all know, is the reason to be living in an Absolute Monarchy.
Neither should you let them know your middle name.
Unless it's "Danger".
If it's "Danger" let them know it, as it instill fear in their hearts.
Or "Wolf". Let them know it's "Wolf" too.
Or a color. Any color instills fear too.
Except "Pink". Don't let them know your middle name is "Pink" or you'll die on your first day in prison.
Or rather, but large collections of random people's dna, in spray form, and spray every crime site.
Some people keep forgetting that arms races are races. The fact that one side moves forward doesn't, by itself, give that side an advantage.
Name + extension is not enough. Files should have a name, a type, and a subtype.
The types shouldn't be optional, but restricted to a list common to all OSs.
The subtype could be the "write whatever you want, and put as many exes as possible because exes are like painting things red so they go faster" crap that extensions are right now.
We cannot play by the rules and expect to win against an enemy that has no rules.
Yes, we can. It's just a matter of changing the rules, just as we do on a daily basis.
Surely this was tested before it was rolled out, right?
If only that was the first time I heard that question today.
If only Slashdot's answer wasn't the same as mine: "...Hmm... nnn.. Yes?... I mean... Yes! Of course!"
"Hey Ivan, check your six." -- Sidewinder missile jacket patch, showing a Sidewinder driving up the tail of a Russian Su-27
