Comment Re:Filesharing not synonymous with copyright infri (Score 1) 106
yes... but you are also solely responsible for the content of your posts should you slander or defame someone else - its a have cake/eat cake kinda thing
yes... but you are also solely responsible for the content of your posts should you slander or defame someone else - its a have cake/eat cake kinda thing
Who knows, maybe the BC is fake but accurate.
like the moon landing ?
no. I'm saying whatever the original intent, the patent/copyright system is fundamentally broken when it comes to IT (tho not restricted to IT)
whatever product protection the system provides is nothing compared to the damage that is wrought upon the entire industry, as a result.
Generate a list of the top 100 IT companies... and then get the number of lawsuits filed by each against each other.
The list is enormous, and the rest of the industry pays the price.
and theres the first fucking problem with the entire IT industry. Patents shouldn't exist. Design patents, software patents.... they're all bs, and they're all used, in the main, for big companies to crush little companies - and its been this way since the days of yore... copyright can get fucked too...
to be honest, I don't have the energy any more to articulate this issue - the system is so blatantly broken, and has been that way for so long, that the fact that it still exists indicates the vested interests are too strong for the system to be changed in any meaningful way
If you don't want to deal with Google, there's a simple solution for you - and Rupert Murdoch. Make them go away!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots_exclusion_standard
Of course - there are ramifications with doing this, but thats what you're chasing, isn't it ??
A rock store eventually closed down; they were taking too much for granite.