Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Interesting... (Score 1) 197

I clicked on your Strike 1 link, read that article then clicked on the link that showed the Google Image search results to see the actual image.

The doctored image of Michelle Obama rightfully generated a lot of negative reaction; however about 8 pictures in to the search results was one showing the similarities between George Bush and a monkey. There seems to be no outrage to this one...

Maybe the difference is an attack specific to an individual vs. an attack that is seen to be against a group of people?

Comment Re:You don't even know what patents are for (Score 1) 252

Agree completely. The only example I can think of where someone used patents as a learning tool is the TRIZ method of innovation, where a Russian scientist in prison combed through thousands of patents to develop an algorithm for problem solving. Since then I haven't heard of anyone proactively searching patents for design.

Comment Re:Lesser of two evils? (Score 1) 646

Wrong, the correct answer is: "We will discontinue the sale, but we can not remove existing copies from a users' devices." Then raise a stink if the publisher tries to coerce them to do otherwise.

I think we are on the same side here, indeed that is what they SHOULD have done. What I was saying was that I think their MBA promotion department did something like this:
Shiny Suit #1: "Whoa, we seriously don't own that copyright and are being sued? What the eff is that going to cost us?"
Shiny Suit #2: "864 sales times $10K damages each, that's like a freakin' billion dollars! Can't we just zap those copies?"
SS #1: "Good idea, and if anyone complains we'll just send em a gift certificate or something to keep em happy."
SS #2: "Solid work here bud, it's 2pm, you know what that means?"
SS #1: "Hooker time! God I love the 'client entertainment' expense category!"
...chest bump...

Comment Lesser of two evils? (Score 5, Insightful) 646

I get the feeling that this was a decision by Amazon based on what would cost them less. Either delete these and face user wrath, or let users who have the books keep them and settle monetarily with the copyright holder. I think they may have underestimated the true cost of losing reputation with their user base, lawsuit cost aside.

Slashdot Top Deals

C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas l'Informatique. -- Bosquet [on seeing the IBM 4341]

Working...