Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:"politicians and employers"? (Score 1) 142

So if I stay at work because I want to, you're going to force my employer to pay me exponentially more even if he didn't ask me to stay?

Yes. You are doing work for them, they are getting a benefit from it. If they don't like it, they can implement a policy that limits maximum working hours.
If studies show that it is harmful to your health, and the employer allows you to do that in the clock, they are liable for injuries sustained at the workplace. They have an incentive to keep you from hurting yourself while on the job.

Comment Re:"politicians and employers"? (Score 1) 142

Ok - lets change it.

How should they stop it? Not allowing overtime? Micromanaging salary people more to make sure they get the full 40 hours from their employees during their assigned shifts and then not allowing them into the building / online after those 40 hours?

Having a sleep test to even walk into the building in the morning? Warn than fire people up if they have an outside of work life that conflicted with this article's definition of enough rest even though they are productive at work?

Force employers to actually pay employees for the time they work, at a rate that increases for every 15 minute block over 8 hours in a day. Having to pay increasingly higher rates for hours beyond a healthy limit would act as a disincentive to work employees to death.

Comment Re:And the point then? (Score 3, Interesting) 226

Presumably, cutting off app access would save power, as the OS could tightly manage the connecting polling while "off". Even though the radios are still on, they could be automatically cycled down, and only brought back up periodically to poll for "important" stuff, saving power. Of course, Apple is the one decided what counts as "important".

Comment Don't you mean? (Score 1) 76

"Some of these vulnerabilities would allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as part of the bootloader (thus compromising the entire chain of trust), or to perform permanent denial-of-service attacks," the research team said (PDF)"

I think they actually mean:
Some of these vulnerabilities would allow a user to execute arbitrary code as part of the bootloader (thus allowing users to have some control over their devices), or to perform installations of custom Android versions with better security than the one that the vendor still hasn't updated after 4 years," the research team said (PDF)

Comment Re:Units? (Score 1) 99

Let me guess - you think that 'gold' is real money? Why? It's just an arrangement of atoms with a few limited industrial applications, completely distorted by irrational speculation. But it's shiny, right?

No. I think they money in my bank account is real. I'm just saying that it only exists as a pattern of 1s and 0s, in a computer system. I'm saying that isn't fundamentally any different than other digital currency, like BitCoin.

Comment Re:Units? (Score 2) 99

They "stole" some bits arranged in a fashion that some people assign a value to. Try to convert those bits to USD, and watch the exchange price plummet.

How is that any different than the "money" in your bank account? It isn't like that money physically exists anywhere. Iit is also just an arrangement of bits in a bank's computer system.

Slashdot Top Deals

Force needed to accelerate 2.2lbs of cookies = 1 Fig-newton to 1 meter per second

Working...