Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - RSA Broke Their Cypher for $10M - NIST Elliptic Curves Broken? 1

An anonymous reader writes: It appears the NSA paid RSA Corp. $10M dollars to switch their default RNG to Diffie-Hellman Elliptic Curves. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/20/us-usa-security-rsa-idUSBRE9BJ1C220131220 After the Snowden revelations, RSA urged its customers to switch to a different algorithm.

If the NIST curves really are broken (as has been suggested for years http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2007/11/securitymatters_1115 ), then most SSL connections might be too, amirite? Happy holidays...

Submission + - NSA Spied Upon: 60 Countries, Unicef, EU Competition Commissioner & Israeli

mrspoonsi writes: BBC Reports: More details of people and institutions targeted by UK and US surveillance have been published by The Guardian, The New York Times and Der Spiegel. The papers say that the list of around 1,000 targets includes a European Union commissioner, humanitarian organisations and an Israeli PM. They suggest over 60 countries were targets of the NSA and Britain's GCHQ. GCHQ monitored the communications of foreign leaders — including African heads of state and sometimes their family members — and directors of United Nations and other relief programmes. The paper reports that the emails of Israeli officials were monitored, including one listed as "Israeli prime minister". The PM at the time, 2009, was Ehud Olmert. The Dutch Liberal MEP Sophia in 't Veld described the latest claims as "shocking". "The UK spying on its fellow EU member states in order to get an economic advantage is simply unacceptable"

Comment Re:Blockchain (Score 0, Troll) 287

Yes the size of the blockchain is fast becoming a problem, especially now that enthusiasm about Bitcoins is growing much faster than the technological means to store the blockchain. Also, the size of every block is going to grow explosively as soon as online services everywhere start accepting bitcoins as payment option, and THAt will be much more problematic.

But then, it'll just drive some more division of labor, with people storing the blockchain and verifying transactions getting paid for the service, much like what is happening now in the mining part. There will definitely be growing pains and I can foresee a near-term future where transactions get a LONG time to validate because miners are swamped with transaction volume.

As for your suggestion, it cannot apply to Bitcoin in any way or shape. Reducing the size of the blockchain means making a "summary" of it where all the wallets that are now zero get short-circuited in the transaction history. i.e 'wallet A sends 1 BTC to wallet B which then sends it to wallet C', you shorten it as 'Wallet A sends 1 BTC to wallet C'. But that eschews the hashing process entirely, so it cannot be done trustfully AFAIK.

Can I just ask your opinion, how does this protect someone who buys into Bitcoin from it actually being a Ponzi scheme?

Comment Re:Paper money (Score 3, Insightful) 287

I tried to use it to pay online, but my business partner complained the bills I faxed ain't legal tender.

This is a good point. Credit card companies and banks use promisory notes (credit) and we trust them that the electronic transactions become real at the other end.

The problem with Bitcoin is it is a floating currency and it is prone to price fluctuation that means its meaningfulness as a means of monetary exchange is currently dwarfed by its speculative importance.

And consider this also: Bitcoin mining depends on processing power. Who has most of that? The very people no one trusts anymore (finally!). Money does not just have to be based on a finite resource, but an honest resource. It needs to be off the grid, independent of power companies (no power, no electricity to do your Bitcoin transactions!), telco's (no internet, no Bitcoin). To store value I would still favor metals, and for day to day anonymous purchasing there are better ways.

Comment Re:I have a thought about where this all came from (Score 3, Informative) 287

We need a way to move money anonymously, and we need it right this minute.

1. Cash
2. Barter
3. Disposable credit cards purchased with cash

But what about Bitcoin? It allows you to stow away massive amounts of money in an untouchable way... kind of nice but it's not without its problems. Is it in society's interest that people can move huge amounts of money without them or the government knowing? It can be very much to our detriment, such as being unable to stem the proceeds of crime that flow out of a country into another, unable to check the movement of money by foreign government sponsored subversion, and so forth. I know that nobody has been realistically able to stop the illegal transportation of gold, but why should we make the task of money laundering easier than before?

Comment Re:Improving the lives of ordinary citizens (Score 1) 236

Less delay in communication devices improves the lives of ordinary citizens.

For example, the gun was an improvement on the bow and arrow, both of which communicate the same message. There are certain uses of this technology that would dramatically improve the lives of ordinary citizens.

Comment Re:Why (Score 1) 162

EU political leaders are slowly understanding the secure phone they where given is junk, trade negotiations where always 'lost' by their own trusted staff, their nations expensive mil/science and secure crypto efforts where given to a list of other countries for 'free' over decades.

It actually doesn't matter what the EU political leaders understand, but the big change is that they have to find a new way to sell the bullshit ideas that they represent to the public now that the public recognizes said ideas as bullshit.

Comment Re:"potentially unwanted programs" (Score 1) 194

Is "potentially unwanted programs" the new politicaly correct term for malware? It's OK to call it malware, even if the user technically-allegedly-probablynot signed an EULA allowing it.

If it runs an unauthorized bitcoin miner, stealing your cycles and electricity, it's malware. No exceptions.

I love Bitcoin, it's so honest, so fair, so real, so future-proof.

Slashdot Top Deals

Business is a good game -- lots of competition and minimum of rules. You keep score with money. -- Nolan Bushnell, founder of Atari

Working...