It's also a huge red flag considering you're only supposed to store hashes of some variety, never the password itself. If how long the password is doesn't affect the length of what you store in the database at all, what is the point of limiting it, right?
Idiosingularicracy will not take 500 years to arrive, that's for sure.
Maybe read on.
"Meanwhile, in the course of this "Terrorist Generation" campaign, for Obama to claim, "you know, I'm really worried about terrorists, so I have to to read -- well, they claim they don't read it -- I have to get information about your email, where you are, who you're talking to, what you have on Facebook; I've gotta put that on my big database"... actually, we're moving into a world which was described, pretty accurately I think, by one of the founders of Google... I don't know if you followed the stories about Google Glass? Well, Google has some new, ridiculous thing, they're marketing glasses which have a small computer on them. So you can be on the internet 24 hours a day, just what you want. It's a way of destroying people, but quite apart from that, this little device has a camera, and presumably, if it doesn't already it will soon have a recorder, which means that everything that's going on around you, goes up on the internet. Some reporter asked Erich Schmidt, didn't he think this was an invasion of privacy, and his answer was exactly right, comes right out of the Obama administration, he said: "If you're doing anything that you don't want to be on the internet, you shouldn't be doing it." This is a dream that Orwell couldn't have concocted. We're moving into it, and it's not the only case. if you read the technical journals, there's more stuff coming along. So, for example, right now there are corporations that are concerned about using computers with components made in China, because it's technically possible to build into the hardware devices which will record what the computer is doing and send it to those bad guys. well, the articles don't point out that if the Chinese can do it, we can do it better, and probably are, so it may end up in Obama's database the next time you hit the computer."
... and they're running away from that. They're really not afraid of X or Y, but rather of having to look at themselves, and prefer their little pretend fears to that. The more power you have, the more this applies to you. People in power simply passing on some of the fear that rules their lives.
What do you think makes people lust for power in the first place? Impotence, fear, inability to love -- from a distance those are one and the same thing, so calling it fear is "not wrong".
Ummm, yes. Removing a small amount is still removing.
While speaking of hipocrisy, why do you hold different outrage for the abuse of non-US citizens versus US citizens?
Also, this stuff goes way beyond partisan politics, and has been going on for longer than even Bush. Don't waste time with petty finger-pointing. Yes, boo for falling for Obama. But also no points for being against Obama by default, just because you "are Republican" (this is all bullshit, you are the person your mother gave birth to, the rest are labels made by assholes to catch fools with, and don't you ever forget that).
That said, while it's slightly off-topic, maybe this can be useful to some:
.. that can only be solved politically. If you want peace of mind, prepare for decades of serious struggle, and learn to be okay with that.
If your ISP and the websites you use hand over everything, if things gets collected at packet level wholesale; what does it even matter what browser you use? It doesn't, not one bit.
So far I have plenty of reason to believe she is, if you believe otherwise maybe you could state your reasons for that. Until then, I take being disgusting to you as a compliment.
On what planet is it ok to excuse a crime by saying that another crime happens more often?
What crime did I excuse that way? Killing someone in self-defense by accident?
Unless you're looking at police reports or other data I haven't seen in this thread, there is no reliable information about what happened.
Even just reading his post is pretty fucking damning.
Now try it with your real name attached, you disgusting asshole.
You can not accuse just anyone to have stolen things from your room which are then found in theirs, for one.
He was in her room, she never was in his.
Then there's the bruises. She has an explanation for them, he has nothing.
Which reminds me, then there is his dumb fucking blog post in response, where he just calls he mentally unstable, and that it should be no surprise to anyone that she would make that up. What psycho fucking bully would leave it at that?
So while you wait for more evidence or someone else to figure it out for you (with that mindset, how can you even say that's what the cops are for: if YOU are unable to figure shit out, how can you verify they are?), I kinda heard enough.
I'm old enough to remember McMartin and how quickly the court of public opinion can crucify somebody only to later turn out to be bullshit
Then why are you not also old enough to remember all the women who got raped or otherwise abused, and were at best ignored, at worst attacked when they asked for help? On what planet is men wrongfully being accused of rape an issue even *visible* next to women being raped?
Just look at this thread and at how many people joke about it, or bend over backwards to pretend there isn't enough information to have an opinion either way, or how technically she could have just as well attacked him. All sorts of insane, cowardly bullshit by spineless anonymous fucks. "rape culture" is not just an empty phrase, it's an atmosphere so thick one can slice it.
Kudos for posting with your account, I guess you're a good dude but I disagree with you. Part of me genuinely wishes she could have simply have cracked his skull. Then it would have been her word against his dead rapist body, and this hardly a story.
That post totally works against him. He seems to think rational argument works the same way as his idea of lovemaking? I posted a comment, but I doubt that coward would approve it (seeing there are 0 comments so far, yeah right), so I'll post it here as well:
So your "argument" is basically "she is mentally unstable". Because you claim that.
How about I claim that you're a rapist, so "none of your post is surprising"?
Try again maybe, this time actually addressing the evidence, the fact that you stole from her room, and how come you've both been bruised after your visit to her.
Oh, actually: if she, according to you, is so clearly mentally unstable, that you are not even surprised she would falsely claim you raped her -- why did you go to her room in the first place??
Why add to being caught, being caught in your own web of lies? You're just adding to it. This isn't looking good for you. Not good at all.