That's bullshit. Environmentalists have for ages supported investments in public transportation. Basically for every new rail or subway line ever constructed you have had loads of people supporting it. You are the one who have decided to not hear that and all the thousands of suggestions from environmentalists on how to get rid of our oil dependence. The first step is to ensure every city has a functioning public transportation system with high coverage so that people can travel efficiently without having to drive. The second step is to encourage people to use it by lowering fare prices and increasing the price on driving using tolls on congested roads. Employers should get tax rebates if, say more than 20% of all employee time is worked from home. Make it easier for people to live close to work so they dont have to drive 40 km each way every day.
There are many more ideas out there, practical stuff that can easily reduce carbon emissions. The green movement are absolutely not just a bunch of whiners but are definitely offering suggestions to the problems.
Great explanation! The 8% interest rate should be compared to the yield the capitalist can expect on other types of investments. Currently, there is absolutely nothing you can invest in to receive such a high return with so low risk. The lender, who is using the capital to finance education and also is shouldering the risk, has to be sure that the investment in education pays off with an cumulative income until retirement that is so much higher than what would be attained without education that the loan can be amortized and the student can have a significantly higher standard of living. Otherwise it makes no sense to make the investment.
Wait, so you're telling me that you're putting pictures of some of recent history's most hated and feared men next to quotes about believing in Global Warming? Congratulations, Heartland Institute, your argument is now so depraved that you've reduced yourselves to holding up pictures of Hitler in a public forum while pantomiming your opponents. Is that reductio ad ridiculum or is this so childish that people didn't even bother coming up with a Latin phrase for it?
Actually it is called "guilt by association" also known as Reductio ad Hitlerum
For more than a century, it has been accepted that about 620,000 Americans died in the the bloodiest, most devastating conflict in American history
But I really think that statement should be qualified with "bloodiest, most devastating conflict involving only Americans." The Indian genocide, World War II, Vietnam War and possibly even the Iraq Wars were deadlier. Non-American causalties should also be counted in body counts.
After any salary raise, you will have less money at the end of the month than you did before.