Comment Re:ICANN is not the police, prosecutor, judge or j (Score 1) 113
FYI, your Goldie Wilson Hover Conversion System should be available next year.
FYI, your Goldie Wilson Hover Conversion System should be available next year.
I think it's childish this idea that automation is taking the jobs away
History has also shown us that it doesn't happen. I remember the 90s when computers were set to take away all the office jobs, the same paranoia happened during the industrial revolution.
Dr Emmett Brown promised us Lawyers will be gone next year.
If you don't believe me, ask the question: Is hate speech free speech?
"Hate Speech" doesn't exist.
Hate Speech = Whaaaaa me no like what you say......
Does uploading a coroner's report into the death of a "patient" who purchased fake medicine count as personal?
I never post anything I wouldn't be prepared to defend in court, but it doesn't stop the cease and desist letters, DDoS and other tactics (threats of harm). This gives people another tool to try and hide the truth.
"should some random dude be able to remove _my_ information that I _want_ to be available?"
I don't know if you were implying otherwise, but it's probably worth making it explicitly clear that they can't easily do so, because Google require proof of ID to honour a request.
What if I'm writing about someone, do they have the power to hide what I've written?
I have received cease and desist letter from scammers, one case the scammer was going after me because they didn't like a coroners report that criticised them for selling fake medicine to the now deceased victim. These people will never take me to court where evidence would be examined, now thanks to the EU they don't have to.
Because censorship IS evil.
In the real world people are less likely to lie on paper than in a digital form.
But it's still possible for them to lie if they are using paper.
The only reason you ever want a snail mail, when you need a verify the senders and receivers identity. If you digitize it, it's all lost. You could have made that in photoshop.
Because nobody would ever lie on paper?
Coal is guaranteed to kill people in the best case scenario.
Nuclear MIGHT kill people in the worse case scenario.
Nuclear plants might be safer/cleaner than coal and all, but when they fail (and they always seem to, due to people attempting to cut costs and corners) it leaves areas of land unusable to us humans.
We've moved on since Chernobyl.
Nuclear is the still the safest source of power available in existence, even if we had another chernobyl or two Nuclear would still retain the title of safest and cleanest energy source.
It has been done before. I think it was in the 90's I saw a briefcase scooter/gocart thing.
I remember the demo being a blue plastic briefcase with a two stroke motor.
And that's the problem. Internet mail became less useful to people when spammers learned how to defeat Bayesian filters.
I get more spam on Facebook than I ever had in email. Spam or not emails are also much easier to sort, organise and archive.
The "pro-nuclear" "crowd" makes up bullshit "victimstance" to try to pretend there is nothing unsafe about 3 melted down nuclear reactors.
What meltdown?
It seems like lying is a prerequisite for joining the anti-nuclear brigade.
"It is hard to overstate the debt that we owe to men and women of genius." -- Robert G. Ingersoll
