Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Share your "encryption network" with Suckerberg! (Score 3, Insightful) 138

Right, that's exactly what you want to be doing if you are interested in encrypted communication... Share the list of other people who want communicate with you via encryption. That way the most intentionally invasive service in the world can build a giant graph of everyone who communicates via encryption. Then the NSA will know who to focus their efforts on just by who has had the most people download their public key or who is at the center of the largest clusters of connectivity.

This could possibly be countered by having everyone download lots of random people's keys. But only if FB doesn't require you to be "friends" before you can exchange keys.

The best way to counter it is to let all the sheeple use it, to give the NSA something to play with, while the astute "encryptionistas" ignore it.

Comment Work remotely (Score 1) 583

Develop a skill set and the self discipline to work 100% remotely. Then you can work for a company in an expensive city while living anywhere you want.

Sure, not all companies will hire 100% remote employees, but it opens up your job search to the entire world instead of just the companies within driving distance of your house. It also allows you to work on multiple contracts at the same time.

Comment Re: Correct, but silly (Score 1) 172

If a work is "transforative" merely because it is displayed in a new context, thus giving it new meaning, then copying a $90k work and selling it for $90 to make a point about how much bullshit this whole "transformative" thing is is therefore also transformative, and thus should be allowed. If some random person was just selling cheap copies to make a quick buck, then this wouldn't apply. But, because it is the original owner of the image selling said transformations-twice-removed (or meta transformations), then fair use should apply.

Comment I went the other way. (Score 4, Interesting) 227

I got out of networking because it is too high stress. All you do is put out fires all day. None of the network equipment I ever used actually did everything the vendor said. All of the software you will have to support is crap, and you can't rewrite it.

Networking is an entirely different skill set. Almost none of your current skills, other than management, will transfer. So that may be your best path. Go for a job as a CIO. You can manage big projects, help them avoid crappy software purchases, and not have to learn a thing about actual networking.

Comment Re: Alternate story title (Score 1) 445

OK. Good point. In this context, if they really believe that the version of history espoused on their web sites IS the accurate version of what really happened, then you are right. They aren't lying. Nor are they doing anything anyone else wouldn't do to "help more people find their websites."

So, in this context, I take back what I said about them being hypocrites.

Comment Re: Alternate story title (Score 1) 445

A) Everybody is "allowed" to lie. Research shows that most everybody lies dozens of times per day, just as part of social interactions. Plus, I really don't care who lies amongst their own group. Christians can tell each other just about anything they want.

B) My point is that christians have, as one of their Ten Most Important Things Not To Do, an edict against lying. However they do it all the time and pretty major ways. So that makes them hypocrites. Even if you say that The Ten Commandments are in the "Old Testament" and therefore only apply to jews, then there is still your Golden Rule, which was supposedly espoused by their supposed messiah. So, by lying, are christians saying that they think it is OK for others to lie to them in such a way. Is it OK to trick them into seeing something they weren't looking for? Porn, for instance? (Yes, hyperbole. Get over it.)

Personally, I lie as little as possible. However, I don't go overboard with the "honesty" by telling people exactly what I think of them all the time either. Every so-called "christian" I have ever met has been a major hypocrite. And I was a pretty involved christian for a while. That hypocrisy is one of the main things that started turning me off to the whole thing. (Now don't anybody start in with the "nobody's perfect, we're just forgiven" BS. I know, you are only forgiven if you are repentant. All of these people were unrepentant hypocrites so, by their own book, they aren't forgiven and aren't really christians. Plus, that wasn't the only thing that convinced me that it is all BS.)

Comment Maybe it IS a PR stunt ... (Score 2) 234

for that system of education. Much research (which I can't cite) supports the techniques he is using. Perhaps all Musk is doing is to lend his name and fame to the promotion of the idea itself. Many people in the upper echelons of the education community, as well as the politicians who make the big direction decisions, are fad followers. If Musk can turn this well established education technique into "The Latest Thing" then maybe it will be adopted and accepted more widely.

Comment Fallacy much? (Score 1) 2

I wonder if Mr. Buffet eats at all? Does he know that it won't help him live forever? So why should he eat at all?

Because the time he does have left so much more tolerable.

No one expects a livable wage to end the wealth gap. And almost no one has called for or expected that. All we want is for the wealthy to stop thinking that their continued hoarding should take precedence over the other 99.9% of the world NOT being miserable. Is that too much to frikin' ask?

Slashdot Top Deals

The best things in life go on sale sooner or later.

Working...