Comment Re:Why (Score 1) 203
Doubtful but it wouldn't really help. Funny thing about the "accepting cash" thing is, that the law only specifies cash must be accepted for debt. So if you owed money as a debt, and they refused to accept cash, and subsequently tried to bring you to court for payment, their refusal can be used to nullify the debt.
(whether this applies to situations where money is owed to the state is unclear, I assume it would work like it does for anyone else but, it might not)
So a store, for example, could operate without using cash at all, but, a resteraunt couldn't because they would be required to accept cash for payment of the debt created by rendering the service. Since no service is being rendered until after payment.... its unclear that they are under any requirement by that.... however there may be other regulations, I am not familiar with what they might be.