More like a helicopter than an aeroplane? Nope. Airplanes are MUCH easier to fly than a helicopter; the average person cannot do this.
More like a large manned quadcopter. They are stable, and with some computer control, easily flyable.
Flying cars? No. Never ever ever will the FAA allow such a thing.
They already do. You just must build it yourself as a kit. There are videos out there of driving helicopter with stowable rotors and other such "flying cars" that are 100% legal. Now, making it legal to sell as a full aircraft is something different. and 3.1 million dollars wouldn't get them past some introductory flights.
Events like this are totally random and tend to be added to both groups equally.
From the statistics I've seen, that's not true. A dead person where sexual preference couldn't have played a role is counted as a "heterosexual" death. That doesn't count equally. So I don't believe your assertion.
Either way straights are still ahead in the death counter in any and all countries, no matter how homophobic or not the culture is.
No, they aren't. Next you'll tell me that there has never been a suicide by car. Note, the federal government doesn't like suicide, so it's not a option on the reporting forms, so a person who decides to commit suicide by getting drunk, leaving a note, and driving into a wall or off a bridge is listed as "alcohol related" and "speed related" artificially inflating those numbers, and *never* listed in FARS as a suicide. Just like the heterosexual numbers include gays roughly equal to their concentration in the general public, and a separate count is kept when gays are killed in hate crimes. This makes gays dead much more often than heterosexuals, but with statistics people can use to prove the opposite point.
And no, I won't take your word for it. If you want to prove your point, prove it with something more than factless assertions.
So American people now refer Tampa, FL as west coast???
What do people in Orlando refer to it as? I've lived on a west coast in the US, and it wasn't PDT.
In addition your shell has to not burn up in the atmosphere.
Someone else posted that for a 100 mile shot, it would exit the atmosphere (and thus have to re-enter anyway). So I expect it would be able to handle a re-entry.
Even if you fire at Mach 10 a competing bomber crew is probably going to have taken off, destroyed the target with an accurate, guided solution, and be home in bed by the time your shot arrives.
Yea, but they don't have the range to hit my secret base on the moon. The trick is how to build the gun on the dark side of the moon so that it can hit the Earth. That way the Earth couldn't see it and certainly couldn't shoot back with lasers or such.
The fact that you don't is entirely the purists' point.
That they understand 100%, but wish they didn't? That's a silly complaint.
Dynamically binding, you realize the magic. Statically binding, you see only the hierarchy.