Instead of putting a tag WORKSFORME (which implies Torvalds/Icaza are idiots in this particular case) is not helping, especially when it obviously is NOT working for many people. Integration absence is a primary target where I would say "not working". It gets better though.

Yet another craptouch device. With rounded corners and probably very shitty app store with whole 10 apps (9 of them are "fart apps").

I am tellin' ya, it is the way I've learned everything! :-D

Of course they can sue. It is the same as suing car manufacturer for being a victim of somebody's wrong driving...

It was a moment when I give a sh*t about it. A-a-a-and it gone: No more MSIE-only planet Earth. If Chrome, Safari and Mozilla will not support it (and they will not) then it will be yet another Silverlight.

Fact #1: Google makes much more money on Apple iOS than on their own Android. The difference is huge.
Fact #2: For Google the whole Android is a "yet another project", while for Apple is a main horse.
Fact #3: Google sells ads. Hence Android is a quantity question, like "Have it the way you want, customize as you like. Just have it (so we will sell our ads on your device)".

Think about it.

Now they will start pop one after another asking millions one after another: uPad, oPad, iPeed, Panasoanic, Snarp, Adibas, Xiri, Sipi, Appe and other genuine Chinese clones of stuff.

Well, that's because Toyota has a little correlation to the Pringles's motto: "Once you pop, you can't stop"... :-)

Much shorter. Until critical security exploit found.

I has been interviewed by Google two times and found once again: you judge people by their questions, not by answers.

Would I like to work to somebody, who is just purely technical jerk, happy he knows a lot? No. Not at all. Why? Because "knowing a lot" does not mean "know everything", but usually the more somebody demonstrates his knowledge, the less he actually knows. I drew a conclusion that at Google they are not getting things other than just pure technically. Sort of soul-less company with a soul-less products. Would I like for such company? Uhmm... No.

Latest rants about Google by their prominent employees and my experience developing for their Android actually only proves it.

So who stop you, notfucking idiot, from steal ideas from Sci-Fi and polish it? :)

I want to say that:

1. Apple could not steal the idea of Prada and make their iPhone with full blown iOS and tools and manufacture it and present just per few weeks (Prada was first pictures found December , 2006 and iPhone was introduced January 9, 2007). Besides, Prada was introduced a two weeks after the first iPhone.

2. You know nothing about Prada. Because it was zero similar to the iPhone other, than just capacitive screen like we had in Palms for years, keypad for making calls, that was already designed on OpenMoko project that was not yet even "hardwared" and sort of desktop, that would you find on some Japanese "keitais".

3. The whole mobile World was literally laughing at Jobs's iPhone by saying "No buttons = shit". But later copied Apple just one-to-one.

4. The whole mobile World was literally laughing at Job's iPad by saying "iPod Touch XXXL". But later copied Apple just one-to-one.

Samsung is the most "creative": they not just put the iPhone device on a paper and outline it with a pencil, ripping off look, feel, design, colors, buttons position, they also stealing Apple icons directly: http://goo.gl/EF456 Others not just have no brains make actually working software, they even does not have brains to find a better name other than simply mirroring it: http://goo.gl/MXi9x

P.S. Just for a record, to stop various idiot fugtards call me as "an Apple fanboy", I am an Android user and developing for it a lot.

OK, cap! :-)