Do you develop on GitHub? You can keep using GitHub but automatically sync your GitHub releases to SourceForge quickly and easily with this tool so your projects have a backup location, and get your project in front of SourceForge's nearly 20 million monthly users. It takes less than a minute. Get new users downloading your project releases today!
Unfortunately unless you work as a programmer for Microsoft's WP7's customer data stealing department you can never truly get a complete set of facts. There are assumptions and trusting others involved in every step of the way.
Nice. That way, there is no way of ever proving you wrong, is there?
Plus I have better things to do then investigative journalism for every Microsoft is Evil (tm) case I hear about. Making certain assumptions is the sensible thing to do.
It's not the sensible thing to do. It just happens to be what furthers your agenda.
If this is new information, I assume it stems from the recent full release of all documents. This is just further evidence that a third party has no businesses redacting anything. Any leaks group should act only as a conduit, not as a arbitrator who decides what stays secret.
Making an assumption and claiming it as evidence. Really?
But without a complete set of facts one must make an assumption.
No, without a complete set of facts, you go looking for a complete set of facts. Making assumptions is what everybody expects you to do, and it leads to people only feeding you partial information in an attempt to guide you towards a specific assumption.
The punchline being that C# has had "using" clauses (try-with-resources) since 1.0 and its compiler type inference (you know, the one it got in 3.0) wipes the floor with that cute diamond syntax thingie.
Sorry for the trollish language, but you know I have a point...
Aren't the measures you mention (password, permissions,.htaccess) exactly the kind of thing that your precious designers and "html coders" (whatever that's supposed to mean) would screw up?
How can you in one sentence admit that "the US does have some serious long term budget problems" AND claim that getting anything less than the highest possible rating would be "political posturing" ?
