So what you are saying is (and please bear with me):
If I steal a book from a neighbour, it's a criminal offense, but if I steal a book from a bookshop owned by a corporation, it is not a criminal but a civil offense?
or:
If I break the windows of a residential house owned by a person, it's a crime; but smashing the windows of a Starbucks is just a civil offense because they're owned by a non-living entity?
So I can go into any shop that is owned by a corporation (e.g., Walmart) and steal what ever I want and the law enforcement authorities cannot arrest me for theft because the entity being 'injured' is non-living and any such injuries against such entities can only be decided by civil courts?
I guess it would say that your friends and coworkers are thick as shit or really aren't that interested in video games.
But then, you can also ask the AI, "where's the salt?" or other some such question and wait for a sensible response. Or ask it to catch a ball. Or navigate its way through a town, find a nice birthday present, bake a cake, create spontaneous conversations with strangers... Lots of things that I'm sure it would fail at.
I pay a lot more than $25 extra to fly with airlines that don't keep pissing me and my family around with seat re-allocations, and I've often avoided poorer quality airlines offering cheap prices).
Price is a factor but it's not the only one. Availability is also a factor as are length of stop-overs, chance of getting bumped up, total flight length, where I have to transit and so on.
Proviso: I rarely fly in the US and my airlines of choice are Singapore, Emirates and Air NZ (the latter of which are often way too expensive so I prefer to go SK or EK which are so far ahead of US carriers it's not real. It's strange considering the US usually has excellent levels of customer service elsewhere why it's so poor for air travel. I guess I'm lucky in that I can often avoid US airlines if traveling to the US.
It's just the British way of doing things.
I've worked for a lot of British companies and on the whole, they pay as little as possible. It's exceptional to start a salaried job on anything other than the minimum of the scale; US companies are much more willing to pay for talent and experience so I prefer working for them.
Yeah, sour grapes. It's gotta be (sheesh, didn't see that one coming Einstein).
The truth is that I'm worried at all. It was a rejection, I've had a few before, I'm getting paid a shit load more doing some genuinely cool stuff elsewhere, am getting pissed off with recruiters contacting me out of the blue with shiny new offers, and am truly enjoying my work.
The experience on the team there really doesn't seem much to write home about, not when compared to the UX pros I've known and worked with. I originally thought that I wasn't good enough - no worries, there's plenty that are happy to pay me - but when this story came up and I was curious why there such a fail in the UX (judging by
Try it - look at some genuinely good UXers on linkedin and compare.
A lot of the negativity here doesn't surprise me too much. I'm a UX designer, a professional with ~10 years experience doing successful projects across industry, excellent qualifications and a resume that gets a lot of interest. My clients more often than not re-hire me if they get the chance because my work is definitely good.
I couldn't even get an interview at canonical for whatever reasons. I'm not entirely sure who is working on this stuff there, judging from the fails they're having and from my own UX network, it's not the cream of the crop. Checking out the Design Team page at canonical doesn't show much.
Real Programs don't use shared text. Otherwise, how can they use functions for scratch space after they are finished calling them?