I'm with you on that. It seems like his sense of humour and his calling "a spade a spade" philosophy earns him a lot of criticism. I always argue that Linus is your typical purest. He's not there to please or appease. He's there to focus on getting things done right, in his own way, but as correct as he sees it.

I argue that because he's giving Linux freely to the world and with limited monetary gain that we can't chastise him too much about it either. What he's missing is something which I've learned through my own errors when dealing with people in the past. And that is, to deal with "the public" one must always do so with the softest possible touch. That's only if you're wanting to earn the minds of the masses mind you.

So I say. People who bag him with the whole "his attitude is appalling" type statements. Well, it sucks to be you because I think that you're just too much of a sook and you need to harden/lighten up a little. The people who condone the attitude I say "meh, you're probably a purest as well" because they wish to understand truth and wish to see what goes on in the Linus' mind just as I do.

As me for me. Truth be told. The day Linus actually starts acting like the rest of the PR sheep out there is the day I'd start to worry about crypto that NSA may of sneaked in to the Linux kernel. Until then. It's good to see him throwing out comments like "Deep throat Microsoft" and "You're ignorant". This kind of talk is indicative of when the internet wasn't populated by commercially driven cock suckers like Mark Zuckerberg abusing the word "hacker" and trying to pass himself off as "one of us".

So at the end of the day, who's really lost touch here?

You pick on poor Tony which is "centre" right-wing. Australia fairs okay because it's usually a centre left or centre right Govt.

This time round we have Palmer, Katter, and the Liberal Democrats in the senate which combined together with the Coalition trump any possibility of left-wing decisions being made. Mate, Tony isn't right-wing enough to keep all the Rednecks happy! :) And Yippee for them!

But I'll tell you this. We had to do something to keep those Greens in check. Rudd was doing a shit awful job and if we let him have another belt at Govt he'd nosedive us in debt so badly that your grandchildren's grandchildren would be paying for YOUR fuck ups. All the meantime they'd be raised in this spoiled view of "the world owes me" socialist crack pot society which nutters like you would of left for them.

Seriously. you're a know nothing do gooder without a care for the concept of reality. You want to hide from truths and blindly look at issues seeking the easy way out instead of trying to uncover things for what they really are.

My advice, while you still can, go off and have a cry in your Govt subsided Wingy Support Group for Wankers before the Libs come in and shut you down for wasting all our hard earned Tax payer dollars!

Why not? FaceBook reporting nothing profits causes the company to be worth close to $100bn. A lot of what the market reflects is flavours of the month, FaceBook's potential is realised to be possible even if by a small margin so every man and their dog pours their superannuation into a company that has a fraction of the asset base of say Google but expects it to be bigger within 5 years.

Microsoft stating that Balmer is going to leave will drive profits even further. Depending on how the news will spin it. Don't forget MSFT lost about 11% last quarter so some of that can just be reclaimed losses after the Surface "brainfart" that took place.

You're not factoring the levels of inflation here. The USD is roughly worth 2 - 4 cents what it was during it's inception. Factor in how badly the USD has inflated your 10T pales in comparison to the true ills of the US. As soon as people start disliking the USD, paying back the debt is where it all comes undone. It's not the amount, rather the rate of spending vs its rate of being paid back.

I think doing it this way is purely strategic. Not only can they play the "plausible deniability" game as the Govt does. "Oh, it was an accidental public key release" but you also ensure the data is successfully transmitted to the masses.

The alternative being what happened last time with the cables release and that is the Govt aggressively shutting down servers and replacing them with nasty place holders and installing honeypots, etc.

We certainly are living in interesting times and considering that you're 200,000 UIDs older than me, you have to consider what Slashdot was like years ago.

I remember when people started taking shots at Slashdot for the type of articles it posted, flamed it for being too mainstream, Apple-centric, or because it's become a popular wannabe geek pissing ground. Though all these things may be true or not, it doesn't really matter.

What's important to know is that Slashdot is about IT/Geek news and if you look at the IT segment alone it has become massively political. The shit fights between Netscape and Microsoft pale in comparison to the crap we're subjected too today. The Obama administration is now getting involved in the Smartphone wars for example ... who would'a thought? The EU slapping Microsoft over antitrust, so what? The US is now posturing against Russia because of leaked data that has been spilled out on the internet. We're talking about "news for geeks" hosting stories about stuff that wars are made from!

You say hardball? you say interesting times? I say how much more interesting is it gonna get?

The fact we even need to have this discussion is what's dysfunctional but I'll bite a little just to satisfy you.

According to Google finance AAPL boasts 72,800 employees. Considering that only a portion of the 72,800 would be affected by this ban, lets say at most say 10,000 employees (who cares if was the whole lot of them was fired). I hardly see any massive level of economic damage made to the US over this, it might suffer a shift unemployment stats a little for this month but it would pretty much be business as usual economically.

Yes, the stock value of AAPL would suffer but the money wouldn't disappear, oh no, that stock value would simply move from AAPL to another company.

So, tell me, you drastic way of thinking here that holds any merit? Or are you too going to call bullshit on this one as well?

How blind must we all be not to see a hidden motive. Let me say that I agree the Govt. should have the power to overturn ITC orders if they pose a genuine threat to consumers and the economy.

Since when did fucking mobile phones become a "necessity" in life that it requires government intervention to ensure that we still get our shiny little pocket device?

If for example the import was Beef and that half the country would starve at the hands of the ITC. Okay, then I'll buy that the Govt needs to stand in. We're talking about phones for God's sake. No amount of discussion on the topic is going to sway me to believe otherwise.

I'm sure they were thinking of all those poor Chinese workers employed by Foxconn that could lose their jobs over this ...

Thank god there's the Obama administration looking out for the little guy!

To say that I didn't know this was possible until now would be far from the truth.

As an avid Air Crash Investigation fan, both my wife and myself watch this show on a regular basis. I surmised this was possible a number of years ago. I also thought the concept of spoofing transponders on Cars when we eventually started adapting this technology to Cars was also going to pose similar issues as well and funnily enough it was something that did make the news (don't remember the article now but it did make Slashdot) but was done so to trump autonomous driving, for whatever political agenda.

In all honesty, there is NO WAY to step around this problem unless you get rid of autonomous driving/piloting all together. Because of some simple facts

a) You can't tokenise any form of communication because it then deems the process unreliable
b) You can't encrypt it for the same reason
c) You can't in anyway make it COMPLICATED again for the same reason
d) You can't get rid of it because it makes flying unsafe.
e) It's a security hole that cannot be patched, fixed or resolved. Period.

Also the fact that this is a pretty common and is a widespread issue, which only really just made POC now is an absolute joke.