Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:If there really is too much solar during the da (Score 1) 338

Actually, the issue is the same as any other power source: it isn't needed all the time it can produce, so you curtail. It isn't a big deal; arguably it is by design that you have more capacity than you need ~10% of the days of the year. That means another ~30% of the days you will have enough solar.

The real problem though is that grid-scale solar was installed without battery requirements at pre-purchased rates. Rooftop solar should have batteries as well for load leveling, but for the large facilities not having batteries makes it a burden on the balance of the sources.

Comment Re:Level 2 chargers... (Score 1) 204

The wall connectors (proper term) do include safety and communications equipment, but the hardware is heavily commoditized. The site infrastructure was what was expensive. Depending on how it was done, each pair of "chargers" needed its own conduit from the panel, and code issues mean that once you have over about 20 conduits you need to space them into multiple conduits. I worked on a project with 100 chargers, and the amount of trenching done was ...sub optimal. You also end up needing to deal with stormwater management because of so much disturbed area.

Today there are a few better options-- simple things like being able to run one conduit for 12 (more expensive) chargers with a code compiant system makes a really big difference.

Comment Re:Read the original article (Score 1) 204

As with many early adopter issues, EV chargers weren't put in for private industry especially well. The construction methods and designs didn't really get very refined until recently. Also, for fleet applications, the Tesla/NACS port would have been a big win-- charging at 48A x 277V rather than 40A x 208V dramatically reduces charging time and cost of construction. I know a lot of desing engineers also short changed chargers when installing them ~10 years ago-- designing for an average of 30A was common with the logic that you charged over an 8-hour shift so a diversified load that would give ~200 miles range in a shift.

Today we have better designs that allow for more rapid deployment and lower costs since they are more mass-market and not one-off.

Comment Re:build more nuke plants! (Score 1) 58

I believe the GP was referring to the waste per MWh. You need to change the operating equation to burn more of the fuel to offset the reduced efficiency due to (IIRC) core poisoning. NuScale specifically has a less uranium-efficient design as I understand. There is also a component of pi*r^3 for reactor waste at end of life.

Comment Re:build more nuke plants! (Score 0) 58

Specific to data centers, nuclear is perfect; great steady baseload, highly centralized load, intrinsic security perimeter, and plenty of open area nearby. The issue though is lead-time and cost. If one of the SMR companies could get to mass production it would be almost perfect. You even reduce cost by eliminating transmission voltages.

Comment Re: ... for a small fraction of 30 of the last 38 (Score 1) 215

Yeah, those systems aren't perfect. If bedrooms are on one system and living spaces on another, the bedrooms can have a higher/lower setpoint during the day, and the other spaces can go higher/lower at night. If (as an example) you are an empty nester, then consider getting a mini-split heat pump for the master bedroom and disabling the central AC for the room.

Really though, if you have an all-electric kitchen and hot tub, you should consider going all heat pump for hot water and HVAC to ditch the gas bill entirely.

I would also look at some of the "DIY" battery options sooner rather than later; signaturesolar.com and diysolarforum.com are useful places to start. You could put in a 15kW/60kWh system for $28k. Or look at the Tesla powerwall.

Comment Re: ... for a small fraction of 30 of the last 38 (Score 1) 215

Do you use temperature resets on the HVAC? Have you thought about a heat pump for the hot tub? Is it well insulated? Cover in good condition?

If you have a significant heating load then something gas-fired like a microturbine or linear generator and thermal storage might actually make sense... but it is hard to pull off in California.

Bottom line is that if things have value for you then you bite the bullet...

Comment Re: ... for a small fraction of 30 of the last 38 (Score 1) 215

Good job... where do you live though? That really determines what your options are.

I've got >5,000 square feet, but a climate that is quite moderate/low latitude and currently have 8.3kW of PV. 20kW would give me about 99.5% availability with a 3-day battery. Average daily is 30-35kWh, one EV that does about 150-200 miles a week. (50kWh.) We have mini splits in the bedrooms only, which works fine here. My IT load is ~7kWh/day, and across all the refrigerators and freezers we have another 6kWh. No hot tub or sauna, but that would easily add 15kWh/day.

But, if you use 80-85kWh/day then maybe you should focus on energy efficiency strategies. If that isn't your thing... don't complain about higher energy bills.

Comment Re: ... for a small fraction of 30 of the last 38 (Score 1) 215

At a residential scale, if you don't have wind and solar (and micro-hydro) resources it isn't economically practical. Personally, I intend to double my PV system (which currently annualizes out my net consumption) and add 2.5 days of storage. That should get me to 4 days per year that absolutely require import from the grid. For me it is essentially a science fair project, although I could realistically give power to my neighbors and pull a bit on the days I need to import.

But it really comes down to what you use electricity for. If you don't really need any IT gear beyond a cell phone, don't have a TV, love cold showers in the winter, and don't need to use heat then it isn't that hard to make something work below 40 latitude.

Slashdot Top Deals

Don't compare floating point numbers solely for equality.

Working...