Comment Re:I'm not entirely sure how it merited a patent i (Score 1) 408
My apologies I haven't expressed this well. I'm talking about how you have expressed something and the name you have called it. I'll try again.
Wikipedia says if an invention has been described by "prior art" it is invalid, while you say that everything in the patent must be taught and it is called "anticipatory prior art". You took someone up on their use of the phrase "prior art" and said he had to refer to "anticipatory prior art". I think that wikipedia shows otherwise. I don't see anywhere on the wiki as it being described specifically as "anticipatory prior art". I don't see anywhere on the wiki that every claim must be described - it simply says it must sufficiently described.