Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Comcast Customer Service renames customer "Asshole" (arstechnica.com) 1

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes: Ars reports that a Comcast customer in Spokane, Washington, who called to cancel the television portion of his service was initially hassled by "retention" specialist before receiving his next bill, with his first name changed to "Asshole".

Comment Re:Slave Labour is certainly profitable (Score 1) 534

by jones_supa (#48923705) Attached to: Apple Posts $18B Quarterly Profit, the Highest By Any Company, Ever

Also, please tell me the name of your MADE IN THE USA cellphone and computer.

So if no one else is producing cellphone or computer in USA, then Apple cannot be expected to? They made the biggest profit, they might as well be the trendsetter of moving manufacturing back to America.

Comment Re:God, what drivel ... (Score 4, Insightful) 214

by jones_supa (#48921909) Attached to: Latest Windows 10 Preview Build Brings Slew of Enhancements

You can disable her.

But why get an OS of which you have to disable half of the features? I don't want Modern UI, I don't want to send information to Microsoft to help to improve my computing experience, I don't want a Windows Live Account, I don't want SkyDrive, I don't want Cortana.

Me no want anything! Waaah!

Submission + - Why Screen Lockers On X11 Cannot Be Secure (martin-graesslin.com)

Submitted by jones_supa
jones_supa writes: One thing we all remember from Windows NT, is the security feature requiring the user to press CTRL-ALT-DEL to unlock the workstation (this can still be enabled with a policy setting). The motivation was to make it impossible for other programs to mimic a lock screen, as they couldn't react to the special key combination. Martin Gräßlin from KDE team takes a look at the lock screen security on X11. On a protocol level, X11 doesn't know anything of screen lockers. Also the X server doesn't know that the screen is locked as it doesn't understand the concept. This means the screen locker can only use the core functionality available to emulate screen locking. That in turn also means that any other client can do the same and prevent the screen locker from working (for example opening a context menu on any window prevents the screen locker from activating). That's quite a bummer: any process connected to the X server can block the screen locker, and even more it could fake your screen locker.

Slashdot Top Deals

All power corrupts, but we need electricity.

Close