Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Beyond the theoretical limit (Score 1) 223

Oh for the ability to edit...

Incidentally, it doesn't violate the 2nd law since the total entropy of the system (which includes the collector and the target) never decreases. The system as a whole is still losing energy.

Heck, for that matter, if you were to encompass the entire sun in an elliptical reflector with it at one focus, the other focus point would experience considerably more than the surface intensity. This system still loses energy though, since no reflector is perfect.

Comment Re:Beyond the theoretical limit (Score 1) 223

There's a theorem in imaging that says you cannot focus a light source to create a beam any more intense then at the surface of what is emitting the light.

Really? If I have a translucent sphere with a smaller spherical source at the center, I have no way to determine by observation what the size of the inner source is, and thus no way to determine the surface intensity of the actual source. Furthermore, if I increase the size of the outer sphere, the apparent intensity at the surface decreases, but if I have a mirror array that fully encompasses it, the total collected flux remains the same.

Does that theorem perchance apply only to refraction not reflection?

Comment Re:As soon as they ... (Score 1) 368

For example, hate-motivated murders are far more likely to be repeated than most other types of murder. If you're willing to kill an Irishman merely because you don't like Irishmen, what's to stop you from killing the next Irishman you see?

And herein lies the problem with current hate crime legislation. According to the law, it's not possible to commit a hate crime against a white man, or a christian, or... (insert other dominant group here), at least not due to their membership in that group.

So if a white man kills a black man because he hates blacks, that's a hate crime. Whereas if a black man kills a white man because he hates whites, it's just murder.

That does mean that under current laws the life of a black man is considered to be more important than a white man. And here I thought that we were supposed to be striving for equality in this country.

Comment Re:Oh, wonderful. (Score 4, Insightful) 261

First look at the breeding rate of all the different species we've driven extinct. Then compare to the reproduction rate of mosquitoes. Also compare the food sources and available habitats.

Problem with driving mosquitoes extinct is that they are among the (relatively) few species on the planet that can live almost anywhere we can, and regards us as food. It also only takes a few of them surviving, and then with their reproduction rate they're back very quickly in that area.

I'm not saying it couldn't be done, but it's be a bitch to do and there'd be a lot of bykill that we don't really want. It'd also take out a very low level creature in the foodchain.

Slashdot Top Deals

Credit ... is the only enduring testimonial to man's confidence in man. -- James Blish

Working...