So where is your data that refutes my comment? Just as I though, you're a worthless troll piece of shit who happens to disagree with my plausible view. Data up or fuck off.

Admittedly, I based my concept on what seem to me to be common sense assumptions given the longevity of radiation and the long migratory habits of fish. If you have data that contradicts my assumptions, I'd like to see it. Cheers

Things to consider:
A. How much radioactive water has actually leaked into the Pacific Ocean prior to the latest reports?
B. What is the true amount of radioactive water still leaking into the Pacific Ocean?
C. How long until the leaks are stopped?
D. Given A,B and C, what will be the total amount of radioactive water to be dispersed from the local site?
E. Given D, how may fish are likely to encounter this area, considering fish migrate thousands of miles?
F. Given E, How many predatory fish will each the contaminated fish, spreading radiation through the marine food chain?
G. What is the period of time the radiation will remain in the marine food chain?

I think I'll be testing my fish with a geiger counter for a while.

They should have gone with Pronto. An Australian ERP company that is quickly responsive to changes in legislation (for Australian and overseas customers) and very flexible during implementation.

I've recently finished a two year planning and implementation of Pronto for my employer, and we are impressed with the outcome. We were on budget, accomplished within a reasonable timeframe (given some feature creep) and the post implementation support is great.

Bring forth the Fava Beans and Chiante!

Holy horse manure! Let me get this straight... you would willingly allow terminated employees to take data... 800GB of research lab data... with them... when they leave??? Holy shit, what is your company researching?? The effects of idiocy on absolute idiots??

So who sets up the production environment at your work place? The developers? OK, that might work, if they have systems administration experience.

Let me bring some perspective to your analogy; Allowing a systems administrator access to the production environment is like giving the scalpel to god.

Because they are hired by the company that you work for to manage the network that they own, and like it or not, you use.

If you haven't presented a case to your supervisor for an alternate printing arrangement, perhaps you should do so. If you have, and it was overturned, either suck it up or quit.

Get back to work or the auditors will see you're abusing company resources posting irrelevant opinions on Slashdot, and I'll be forced to restrict http access for all users.

Yeah, those new pink ecstasy tablets are wonderful, aren't they?

No, it looks like Captain Goodvibes' Snout (AKA the Pig of Steel)

-- Life's short, death's long, so's my dick, pass the bong

No, it looks like Captain Goodvibe's snout (AKA the Pig of Steel)

-- Life's short, death's long, so's my dick, pass the bong...

Excellent. Now my Beagles can rock on all day long.

I'm not sure of the validity of your claims on margarine, so references would have been nice. However I used to drive past a margarine factory in Sydney most evenings and the smell coming out of that place has ensured I will never consciously eat margarine.

G'day Mr Fjord, may I suggest you try a thin scrape of Vegemite on a bbq chicken sandwich. YUMMO