Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment most of the people here can make a computer lie (Score 1) 388

I want to go back to voting with punch cards. It's cheap, simple (unless you're a retiree in West Palm Beach), there are less opportunities for shenanigans, and there's an archive to go back to for a recount rather than "oops, district 733 crashed; they don't count this year".

Comment back of the envelope calc (Score 1) 221

(A (Campaign contributions) * B (number of years of service) ) + ( C (cost of jobs given to friends/relatives ) - D (their actual productivity) ) + E (speaking fees paid to the senator after the senator's retirement) = TCO Now subtract TCO from the gains from favorable legislation and you'll see that your average senator can be a real bargain. Collect them all!

Comment Re:Guilty? (Score 1) 296

I won't consider him guilty until he's convicted, and maybe not even then. He had to know as soon as he gave up anonymity, something like this would happen to him. The powers that be will ruin him as much as they can, as publicly as they can, both as a warning to others and as a distraction from the truths he helped reveal.

Comment Re:99.999% false positives? (Score 1) 376

Even a false positive might only be false after the fact. In this case, I think if the cops showed up asking about the curious searches that they a) wouldn't have gone through with it and b) might have been busted for possesion even if they still would have.

The female doesn't seem to have been arrested yet but the boyfriend has. I'm expecting a breakup.

Comment Doesn't matter that he won. He lost. (Score 5, Insightful) 278

He lost 11 months of freedom and overall two years of his life fighting bullshit charges. He had to move in with his parents, his girlfriend left him (she got arrested too), I presume he's no longer employed, and two years later he has nothing to show for it but a hollow victory in court. The government got what they wanted out of him: He's a warning to others of what they can do to you even if you've done nothing wrong.

Comment Re:Okay, stupid question. (Score 1) 280

I'm guessing that his particular machine had a failure similar but not exactly what Apple had quantified as the video card failure. Maybe the video card and the motherboard both popped. Apple techs saw this, or at least a failure they weren't expecting, and said this is not the video card problem and therefore we won't repair it. I'm guessing Apple corporate sent lawyers and not techs to the court case and when he trotted out his evidence they were unprepared to rebut it.

Comment Re:Okay, stupid question. (Score 2) 280

That's not a stupid question. It looks like Seattle Rex has gone out of his way to keep his name out of his blog (I've skimmed, not really searched, so this may not be true). His whois record is almost anonymized, too. However.... if there's a court case, that means there are court records. Many districts put their court records online to some degree and Seattle looks to be one of them.

I searched for all court cases involving a company named Apple in King county, WA and I found one filed in small claims court. Case number 125-00818 was filed March 1, 2012 (which matches up with a blog entry he made). The details of cases aren't available online for free, they charge $0.25 per page here, and that's pretty much where I stopped. I'm not going to spend the cash to find out more.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Religion is something left over from the infancy of our intelligence, it will fade away as we adopt reason and science as our guidelines." -- Bertrand Russell

Working...