Don't hold your breath....

I've tried to have a reasonable discussion on this topic with many people who are of the mindset you describe.
It always devolves into a "think of the children" tack, where people that are ok with omnipresent monitoring argue that we can't have a safe society unless everything is tracked, which of course is utter bullshit.

I started using cash for most of my "discretionary" purchases lately.
Things like grocery shopping, clothing, Home Depot, going to the bar, etc...

I initially started doing it because of how porous and UN-trustworthy the whole paradigm of card transactions is.

This article hits home on how using cash helps me in another way, being that my purchases can't be tracked.

You know it really is interesting seeing how (for lack of a better phrase) Orwellian the whole system is getting.
Interesting, as in Hindenburg appointing Hitler Chancellor in 1933...

Actually I prefer "Merka", thank you.

Really, Fox News is actually on cable, right?

One of the best descriptions of FB I've read.
Bravo!

There are several books that cause such social contagion "hive-mind" behavior, the most popular being The Bible and The Koran.

It's been really amazing watching what this guy has done and continues to do with his money and energy.

Why?

Compare to other tech billionaires and what they do with theirs...

I have my LG 42" LCD, my ONKYO Receiver, and my Sony Blu-Ray all plugged into a power strip.
Connected to the them are a digital antennae for OTA, an ethernet connection for NetFlix, and a Linux pc for everything else.

Cable?
Satellite?

Are you kidding me?
Do people still pay for that crap?
Who are these people that stay beholden to the most despicable industry in America?

My linux pc goes to "sleep" when I'm not using it...
When I'm done with the rest of them, I power off the rest, then turn off the power strip.
I've been doing it this way for years...
Never had any issues, except with Sony's bullshit user/login setup on their Blu-Ray players, but that's another story...

Brilliant!

To quote Roger Waters from Amused to Death:

I can't believe an avalanche of "Yea, but you have to appoint former industry bigwigs as regulators because they're the only ones who really understand industry" replies haven't shown up yet.

It appears the lobbyist apologists are slipping here on slashdot...

How your post was modded insightful is anybodies guess, and I think the answer lies in what you say, about the "mental capacity of neanderthals".

To begin with, did you RTFA?
It doesn't appear that you did.

The surprising findings from the research was that the arctic sea ice is a collector of sorts for the unfathomably large amount of plastic spewed into the oceans by man and his industrial offal. The amount of plastic found was "three orders of magnitude larger than some counts of plastic particles in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch" Maybe that isn't interesting enough for you, but it is for me.

Also from the article:
"Plastic is chemically inert. But the plastic can absorb organic pollutants in high concentrations, says Mark Browne, an ecologist at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Browne has performed laboratory experiments with marine organisms showing not only how the microplastics can be retained in tissues, but also how pollutants might be released upon ingestion. "

If any sort of +5 outrage should be generated by the research and its findings, its from the fact that mankind has and is continuing to pollute and degrade it's own biosphere.

Hello? Anybody in there?

"Thinly veiled reference to global warming"?
Wake up yo.

This is why there is a fight right now about the proposed pipeline from The Basin to Salt Lake to transport the waxy crude.

The pipeline has to be heated to keep the "oil" from congealing:
"Uinta’s black wax crude must remain above 95 degrees and yellow wax above 115 degrees or it’s liable to congeal."

The proposed pipeline would cross several of the watersheds where those that live along the Wasatch Front get their drinking water.

So the question is, what is more important, a stable supply of drinking water, or the ability of a small minority to make even more money from refining waxy crude?

It's interesting to read the back and forth arguments anytime fossil fuels are discussed.

For some reason people, especially those benefitting from the carbon extraction industry, often take a very black and white view of the situation. Their view is usually that renewables are a waste of time, and that only our carbon based energy paradigm is practicable.

The reality is that the rest of the "First World" is moving ahead rapidly with renewable energy.

Whether it is China, Germany or Brazil the leadership in these other countries are taking the steps necessary to insulate themselves from the dependence on carbon based energy(fossil fuels). They are doing what is known in investing as "diversifying".

Right... I know you've heard this before...

Sure, we still need oil and gas. Of course we do. Oil should be used for plastics, etc. Gas for heating, energy, transportation, etc; But it seems to me this whole fracking boom that is going on is just another way to slow the adoption of renewable energy.

But what the US should be doing is throwing itself fully into renewable energy.

What are we waiting for, a "Sign from God"?
That sign from God may not be a pleasant one.

Forget Solar, forget Wind. There is vast Geothermal energy potential in the western US. Now, go ahead and remember Solar, because there is vast solar potential in the southewestern US, via Solar Thermal. Why aren't we moving full speed ahead on this? Wind energy? Sure, the plains, all the way from Montana to Texas have loads of potential?

The US could be a leader in renewable energy.
Obama said as much during his 2008 campaign, yet I haven't seen this switch to renewables.
America, it's time to wake the F up.

I had to install CrapBlock on my toilet...