Honestly I forget the details that I did read about the attacks, and can't keep Sunni and Shiite apart, but I remember hearing someone explain it and explained why it was much more likely that the chem attacks were Assad rather than the rebels.
LOL, that is a good example of modern journalism - you do not know why, but somehow you believe it's true, because some smart looking people with serious faces was discussing the issue on TV and came to this conclusion, or maybe your read article in reputable newspaper written by 'doctor of middle-eastern affairs' who surely understand all this Sunni and Shiite relations and stuff like this?
Speaking of bullshit, it's very hard to take you serious when you spew it yourself about Chernobyl.
Check how Chernobyl was handled - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2Q6VDQWtqk . In short - 600 000 people finished sarcophagus in half a year. What is done to secure Fukushima in more than 2 years? Also check comparison - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Fukushima_and_Chernobyl_nuclear_accident , look at radiation levels on site and amount of fuel in reactors. Fukushima is much easier to clean up than Chernobyl, and risk of apocalyptic contamination is much higher! One more tsunami and what? What will happen if all fuel that is now in reactors will be washed out to the ocean and spread worldwide by currents? It's a fucking doomsday machine that is set to trigger by random chance! Maybe Tepco employ dr. Strangelove as head of clean up operation?
UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker