Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:ah the anti-NSF crowd again (Score 5, Informative) 307

I could point out that some research on both sides are utterly crap. funding the study of beetles migration habits? yeah I dont think we need to waste money on that one

Unless you care about how it could affect agricultural production. The boll weevil alone does $300 million in damage to cotton crops. The bark beetle and elm leaf beetle carry Dutch elm disease, which has devastated elm trees in both Europe and North America. Another beetle damages potato crops in Idaho. On the other hand, there are beetles that eat pests and the dung beetle saves the cattle industry $380 million every year in dung disposal costs.

Comment Re:Capital vs Labour (Score 1) 531

It's interesting to hear people talk about "productivity of the economy going up while employees who grow the productivity aren't ripping the reward, instead the owners do". Well excuse me, the owners created the productivity, not the employees. Employees are not adding to productivity, it is the owners, the investors, the capitalists that are improving their productivity. In case of the noodle restaurants the productivity of the owner (investors) of the restaurant is going up, he can serve more noodles with fewer labourers doing manual work, but it costs him the original investment into the labour saving device - the robot.

Except that the labor saving measures tend to require better trained and educated employees. Take an adult from 100 years ago, put them in front of a computer, and you'll get all of nothing.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "Surely that's just a matter of training. The person from 100 years ago had different skill that were probably quite useful." And I'll say "Sure did, and capital had expensive equipment that became obsolete too."

Comment Re:It seems most have missed the other part of thi (Score 1) 376

Wait... so they're encrypting the channels and then releasing the way to unencrypt it to open source projects? What exactly would be the gain here? I mean, the only thing it will do is mean that third party PVR makers will be put out of commission whenever the cable company changes it's standard... oh, I see.

Comment Re:I'd like to see more of this (Score 1) 139

And then immediately after, they set up hundreds to thousands of shell companies and transfer copyrights around and around whenever they hit that limit and you're back to square one. Oh, and for added fun, you'll get multiple DMCA notices from subsidiaries of the same company when they can't keep track of their own movement and which subsidiary owns what.

Comment Re:Why... (Score 1) 1113

The earlier event which really decimated higher learning in the Middle East: The Sack of Baghdad by the Ilkhanate. Essentially the center of learning in the Muslim world was utterly destroyed. Libraries were burned down, books were tossed into the river, scientists and philosophers were massacred, and a canal and irrigation system that was built up over a period of thousands of years was completely dismantled. If you wanted to parallel it to an event in Europe, the closest analogue might be the sack of Rome (though even that isn't really comparable, as Rome had already fallen far from it's heights).

Comment Re:There's no point in going into the past (Score 1) 658

Unless your "time machine" is also a "place machine". At least for those of us in the US.

Give the rotation of the Earth, the revolution of the Earth around the Sun, the revolution of the Sun around the center of the Milky Way, and the movement of the galaxy through the universe, if you went forwards or backwards in time by pretty much any non-trivial amount there's a near certain chance that the point you're in is in the cold vacuum of space.

So I think it's probably reasonable to assume that a time machine can get you to somewhere else in the world.

Comment Re:So Start Global Gardening Riots (Score 1) 926

Perhaps you missed all the recent news items about all those government agencies that are stocking-up on huge quantities of ammunition?

You mean that Social Security Administration ammunition story last week? It's a non-story. They've got 295 agents that make arrests, execute warrants, and investigate fraud and just happen to carry guns when doing so because people committing social security fraud aren't always nice and friendly. Given that it's around 600 bullets per agent, which includes all the ammo they'll use for training in a given year, it's not some extraordinary amount.

Slashdot Top Deals

What this country needs is a good five dollar plasma weapon.

Working...