Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Get the basic facts right at least (Score 1) 898

The person (Natasha MacBryde) whose tribute site he defaced had committed suicide by throwing herself under a train. She had committed suicide because of online cyber bullying.

He defaced her family's memorial page with the altered train photo knowing that her family would see the connection between the altered train and the cause of her death. A reasonable person could be expected to know that would be grossly offensive to her family.

In the UK sending a message that is grossly offensive is considered an offence under the Communications Act 2003 section 127.

That is why the parody has legal significance.

Comment Re:Let's just... (Score 1) 144

Let's face it, Copyright didn't exist in Mozart's days did it?

First British copyright law: 1709
The British Statute of Anne 1709, full title "An Act for the Encouragement of Learning, by vesting the Copies of Printed Books in the Authors or purchasers of such Copies, during the Times therein mentioned".

Mozart: 27 January 1756 – 5 December 1791

Comment Re:A Smart man once said... (Score 1) 207

By 'book', Einstein meant a physical, printed, unchangeable book.

When we're relying on the internet for unchanging 'facts', we're at the mercy of information storage that can be changed at will.

In George Orwell's 1984, history was re-written by destroying books and creating new ones.

But when our brains don't remember 'facts' because we think the internet will remember for us, those facts can be changed without us realising.

We're reliant on a system of logging, caching and revision-history to tell us otherwise.

But not every stored fact on the internet has the revision-history of wikipedia et al.

Comment Re:Funny... (Score 1) 391

At least filming police is legal in Arizona, even if frowned upon.

In the UK we now have the Kafkaesque Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 which considers civillian filming of police to be 'eliciting or attempting to elicit information about (members of the police)' as 'likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism'. Maximum penalty: 10 years inside.

Slashdot Top Deals

You have a message from the operator.

Working...