The reactors you're currently familiar with were _designed_ to have the 'radioactive waste' problem - it's what makes them useful for manufacturing atom bombs. Thorium reactors don't have that problem.

Thorium reactors have been around nearly as long as Uranium reactors. One operated for 20 years in the USA from the 1950s to the 1970s. The only reason they were never fully developed was political, not technical (they needed those bombs!):

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

FWIW, we could have got them working and be running the county on unlimited, safe energy for much less than (eg.) the cost of the F35 program. If there was any political willpower.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/fin...

"In spite of..."

And investment in renewables and clean-nuclear is almost non-existent. Color me shocked!

PS: Fracking is being given a totally free pass too!

Country run by oil barons does nothing when there's an oil problem!?!

Film at 11.

"Disabling Java is the recommended course of action" ..and has been for several years now, Zero-day exploits or otherwise.

How many F35 test flights is $110 million?

Just as soon as the idiots start looking at reliability reports instead of benchmark speeds

(ie. never).

Are Texan Drivers worse than Californian Drivers?

Disclaimer: I've not from the USA and I've only ever driven one time in San Jose.

(apparently I shouldn't have driven through the neighborhood with boarded up windows...my bad, I was lost!)

Also let us know how an automated security product is supposed to work.

One of the fundamental tenets of 'security' is that it's a ongoing process, not a finished product:

https://www.schneier.com/essay...

Because multiple launches are free and increase reliability...?

Subject says it all...

How about NoScript? How's that one coming along?

It's Australia, this will be made illegal in a couple of days time.

Until then they're getting a lot of free publicity.

It's almost as if you didn't read the last line of the summary.

Or any of the posts that were before yours.