The big box news orgs have learned that taking a moderate position on anything is bad, so they turn everything into a this side vs that side issue. You're making this into a political issue as much as the other side! It's funny, in politics 90% of it is the pot calling the kettle black.
The problem isn't terms of service or conservatism, it's the fact that all information is corrupted by corporate influence and profit bias, and thereby all decisions are corrupted by corporate influence, public and private. If that wasn't the case, than malpractice insurance and medical lawyers wouldn't be necessary.
Because the pharmas dust problems under the rug, it puts people in danger because they don't know what to look out for. One problem no one is acknowledging with the mRNA approach is that a vaccine administrator can nick a blood vessel and inject into the bloodstream instead of the muscle, the blood cells will uptake the mRNA, grow spikes, and get tangled and form clots, and damage vessels. Leading to stroke, heart inflammation, tears in arteries that turn into plaques, etc.
If that didn't happen to you, great! But it could happen to anyone, and not acknowledging that risk puts your message directly in line with a pharmaceutical sales rep.
The reason older women were noted to have a risk with clots is simply mechanical. The bulk of super morbidly fluffy folks are older women, and it is difficult to get to a muscle to inject into when there is a large layer of fat, leading to more injection errors.