Actually, garbage men are mostly unionized and get pretty good pay.
It's the guys in the fast-food joints and Walmarts that are truly poor.

So everybody has their own starship? And nobody's starship is any more powerful or luxurious than anybody else's?

There will always be scarcity.
If there isn't any at the moment, someone will figure out how to create a new scarcity so that they can have more of it, and thus make others envy them.

This is part of Kurzweil's singularity.

Kurzweil is a nut case whose only justification for these predictions is that he really, really, really wants them come true before he dies.

There's a simple answer to all of these problems: cut population. If there were only 700 million people in the world, rather than 7000 million, there would be little unemployment, hunger or crime.

Or, just move to another state after graduating (which is very common anyway).
That way, the state you graduated from will have no jurisdiction to tax you at all.

That is , it says nothing at all. Didn't the poster read it?

Left wingers believe that success creates social injustice

Prove it.

And no, quoting another right-wing asshole who agrees with you doesn't count.

There is nothing wrong with PWRs.

Except that they tend to melt down when the operators screw up. And they will, eventually.

The reason nukes aren't being built has nothing to do with environmentalists, and everything to do with investors.
As in, there aren't any.

Who wants to invest in something that may pay back its construction costs in 20 years, when 5 years is considered a long time for ROI.
And that's only when the taxpayers are forced to underwrite the thing, since private insurance companies won't touch a nuke project.

And it should be required in the building code for apartment buildings, commercial buildings etc.

What's wrong with adblocker? Do you think news services get more money when you don't use it?
Hint: they don't.

Selecting stories for their relevance and challenge does not come free.

Wait: you're actually saying that people like soulskill, Roblimo and Timothy get paid for what they do?

Nobody wins a "debate" like this, because it isn't a debate.
Pitting blind faith against scientific reason is just a waste of time.

I've been to similar places in Alberta and Utah.
They have fossils of dinosaurs that can be chemically proven to be 100's of millions of years old, and no humanoid fossils more that 1 million years old.
It has nothing to do with whether you or I were there, you ludicrous twit.

You've repeatedly claimed that there is a "logical problem" with pointing out that Ham's arguments have nothing to do with science, yet you never say what that "logical problem" is.

So, let hear it. I double-dog dare you.