Ubuntu 10 has been a PIA for me.
Its generally in the same spot as 8.04. I haven't had any problems finding stuff. I just checked smb.conf was in the usual place.
You use the find command and good ol ubuntu leaves out crucial syntax points in their man pages...Often my biggest issue in Ubuntu is not so much that I dont know what I want to do, but rather, I cant find what I want to do. I ahve pretty advanced knowledge of firewalls and routers but WTF do you do when you cannot find the conf file or force it to reload?
Give ufw a look, it is great. No more messing about with iptables.
For now I think I am going to be sticking with redhat derivatives...seems to be more support there.
I believe CentOS might have better community support on the server side.
If ubuntu wants to win over more windows folk, they really really need to fix that dammed GUI, or at the least work on encouraging the community to be more active. I have 3 separate threads asking for help on either iSCSI, SMB, or NFS. Only got 2 hits and they only posted twice before going MIA. You would think that Ubuntu would be better at supporting communication between windows and Linux.
On the client side, I doubt you can beat Ubuntu, and I'm sorry you're having SMB problems but you should be patient. I had SMB problems with OSX 10.6.0,1,2 that were finally fixed in 10.6.3. Ubuntu 10.4 works wonderfully as a client for me, connecting to corporate Windows and my Samba Linux shares.
It's still going to lead to a lot of small-scale tardgedies.
Thats not punny!!!
"Show business is just like high school, except you get paid." - Martin Mull