Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Yes (Score 2) 467

Why on earth are you repurposing ~7-10 year old server hardware?
You really cannot trust such devices in production environment and repurposing for testing would fail because you might run into issues installing current software on that hardware as it's not officially supported.
Don't test with obsolete hardware.
If your plan was to run linux on them, why did you bother with BMC updates, just leave it unconfigured. Yes, it'll flash ugly orange error messages, but you know those are unneccessary and you'll remote manage the machine over ssh anyways.

Call Dell, explain them that you need new servers and you'd like to recycle your old ones.
They'll likely even give you some discount for the old machines rather than charge you for recycling them.
You get new hardware to work with, which is under warranty again, and it's most likely less power consuming and produces less heat so you'll save on the energy bill and cooling as well.

This is assuming you are the first owner of the devices though. If you bought them second hand, you're SOL.

Comment I'd urge anyone to look inside Roomba (Score 4, Interesting) 64

I really recommend anyone with roomba to take their screwdriver and open the thing.
Once you do and compare the inner workings to the device linked in the article, you really start to understand the concept of product design.

To recap the differences for those who don't own one:
Roomba design shows massive modularity. Every component inside is relatively easy-to-swap module.
It's very easy to fix if something breaks down when everything is attached with 2-3 screws max.
Modules have fixed connectors which just slot in. You won't end up in situation like: "ooh, this 4-pin connector looks like that one, did I connect it right?"(see the pics linked - power connector and speaker for example)
You could probably 3D print matching spare modules if you made drawings for one.

Parts of the rover, like motors and gears are supposed to be modular, yet they don't really look like that to me, maybe I'm just misreading the images.
To me, it looks like "Made in China" - medium cost build. There's some build quality, it's not made from the cheapest material available, but it's not for daily use. Well, it's supposed to be a toy..
In the Rover, wifi and camera modules are most likely USB yet they use different cabling, why?
For hackable toy, those should be replaceable easily. Roomba doesn't have USB for wifi or camera either, but then again, it's a vacuum cleaner!

It’s one of those toys that is relegated to the closet shortly after its first set of batteries die.

Something from the article I'd have to agree with.

Comment Targetting commercial VPN providers? (Score 3, Interesting) 111

I'm assuming they're targetting commercial vpn providers rather than companies using VPN?
If not, I'd like to get some address where to register corporate endpoints which should be excluded from filtering.
Otherwise managing workstations and servers located in China might become rather tedious.
Atleast this IPSEC VPN to China which I'm using to post this message seems to work just fine right now.

Comment Re:Datacenter catastrophe checklist (Score 1) 50

Or you could

1) place physically similar datacenters around the world
2) make your datacenter virtual, so you can keep the applications running at any place, and verify that hot-migrate works
3) ignore localized storms, since you have capacity and uptime on global scale

Sure, you notice that the datacenter goes down, but you don't have to waste diesel on generators, since the services have already been handed over to the next datacenter to handle.
Your crew can stay at home sleeping in their own beds rather than some cleaning closet or meeting room at datacenter and fix things once the storm has passed.

Comment False (Score 5, Interesting) 179

Patents won't touch you if you make 1-10 units.
Other manufacturers won't consider you as worthwhile to legislate against since you most likely won't make any profit from those devices sold.
From US point of view, good luck getting your device FCC approved, that'll be cheap and fun process!

Comment Re:Return of terminals (Score 1) 625

Because that wouldn't allow me to use the device like a smartcard and login to every system with entering my unlock key/pattern.
I'd have to separately configure email for that PC, install software, update software... why the extra device?
All that stuff is already on my mobile.

Comment Return of terminals (Score 2) 625

I'd like my cell phone to act like a thin client.
Just pop it into charging dock and it gives you browser and email on big screen(s) and rdp client to access applications on server for those things your phone isn't powerful enough itself.
The dock could even have external GPU for extra power.

Slashdot Top Deals

Dynamically binding, you realize the magic. Statically binding, you see only the hierarchy.

Working...