You said:
The full version of Windows 95 was Windows NT and it wasn't cheap.
I said that what you said is factually incorrect, which it is.
You said:
Your all missing the point.
I wasn't replying to any point, I was merely stating fact.
Also, in that context, it's "you're", not "your".
Further, the point being made in this thread was about cost/quality.
Finally, Windows NT was not made to be a business version of Windows 95. It (NT 3) was released before Win95, and had a Win3.1-esque GUI. NT4, which was released in 1996, was a continuation of a pre-existing Windows family line.
Windows NT