Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Cellphones

Verizon To Allow Skype Calling On Its Network 98

The Verizon press release begins: "At the 2010 Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Verizon Wireless and Skype today announced a strategic relationship that will bring Skype to Verizon Wireless smartphones in March." What used to be one of the most protective carriers anywhere has been opening up in major ways since the introduction of the Motorola Droid. Phandroid summarizes: "Starting next month, Verizon Smartphone users with data plans will enjoy free and unlimited Skype-to-Skype calls to anyone on the planet. And you’ll enjoy amazingly cheap Skype International calls as well. All this from Verizon Wireless’ 3G network." Some are wondering how the DoJ and law enforcement will react to a major upsurge in fully encrypted traffic.

Comment Re:Seriously?!? (Score 1) 648

It's illegal for them to do this, IMO. And I am not a lawyer, however, if someone wants to buy a computer from Psystar, then go buy OSX Leopard and install OSX Leopard on the computer, that's the users's prerogative. The problem comes up when Psystar is installing the OS on the machine and selling it. That's the illegal part. I guess?

Comment Re:Berne convention? (Score 1) 648

Comment Re:Berne convention? (Score 1) 648

Being Pedantic -- OSX is Darwin. Darwin is Apple developed code based on Nextstep, FreeBSD, and OpenStep. When Apple bought OpenStep (which was NextStep), they developed an OS named Rhapsody. Rhapsody was forked into Darwin. Darwin is the basis of OSX. The major difference in all is the Mach kernel.

Comment Re:Berne convention? (Score 1) 648

I think they only did that with 10.3, I had the same problem going from 10.2 to 10.3. But after 10.3, they have been full install disks. On the other hand, we were installing them on Apple Hardware, right? Which means that if the "original media" is OSX based hardware, Apple *could* claim that the disks were "upgrades"? I'm not a lawyer, and don't pretend to play one.

Comment Look, really? (Score 2, Insightful) 371

We know Steve is going to die, someday. As much as we'd probably like to put him in some cryogenic container, thaw him out every few years when products start to suck ass -- we know he's going do die AT SOME POINT. Why is this blowing up to be such a freakish crazy thing? So he's turning over the keynotes to someone else!? How about he's turning THIS one over to someone else. Will he still headline his own events, that Apple throws? Probably. How about WWDC? Come on. I don't blame them for pulling out of macworld: http://www.joelesler.net/finshake/Blog/Entries/2008/12/16_Apple_pulls_out_of_MacWorld%2C_OH_NOEZ.html But CNBC said it best, IMO: http://www.cnbc.com/id/28265938

Apple Laptop Upgrades Costing 200% More Than Dells 935

An anonymous reader writes "C|net is highlighting the astonishing cost of Apple laptop hardware upgrades, compared to Dell — in some instances, Apple is charging 200% more for upgraded components, such as memory and hard disks. Either there's a serious difference in the quality of components being used, or Apple is quite literally ripping off those who aren't able to upgrade hardware themselves."
Media (Apple)

Apple to Rule the Digital Home by 2013? 223

Stony Stevenson writes to tell us that a new study from Forrester Research is taking a crack at what seems to have become a hobby for so many, predicting Apple's market strategy. Specifically, Forrester is predicting that Apple will become the 'hub of the digital home by 2013.' "Forrester predicts that Apple will offer eight key products and services to connect PCs and digital content to the TV-stereo infrastructure in consumers' homes. A 're-engineered' Apple Store will expand into in-home installation services to deliver what Forrester describes as a 'fully integrated digital experience.'"
Operating Systems

Running Mac OS X On Standard PCs 623

ZDOne writes "ZDNet's reviews team have been tinkering with the various ways of running OS X on standard PCs. They found that with the right hardware components, a standard PC running Mac OS X Leopard is, at first sight, no different from a genuine Apple Mac. Special CPU extensions such as Intel VT-x provide support for software solutions like Parallels Desktop for Mac. Even Adobe Photoshop, which queries a Mac to verify its authenticity, runs fine on a standard PC thanks to EFI emulation. However the article points out that it's a pretty technical proposition to get OS X running on non-Apple hardware, beyond all but the most powerful power users. And then there is the legal question. Don't even think about trying to put OS X on your PC without first purchasing a legitimate copy of Mac OS Leopard."

Slashdot Top Deals

What hath Bob wrought?

Working...