Comment Re:WTF (Score -1, Troll) 297
At their own risk, indeed. Many (not all I admit) sceptic scientists have been publishing good solid work "at their own risk", but there is no one there to protect them when they are bullied, harassed, rejected, fired.
The science is hard to get through some folks heads, even many scientists. Confirmation bias exists, on both sides of the debate.
You can take your hurt feelings about duplicity and personal attacks and look in a mirror. Read my first line.
Cherry picking is done all over the place. Especially in climate science and especially by the alarmist side of the debate.
Talking about money, how are those billions of dollars in grant money comparing to a few million dollars budget of sceptical organisations like the heartland institute?
"Passivity"... REALLY!?!?!?!?\
Alarmists and green organisations are DOWN RIGHT AGGRESSIVE. They always have been.
They call for no less than:
- The death penalty
- Jail time for people expressing their opinions
- Murder
- Exploding heads of those who dont tow the line (look at the propaganda video)
And you go and call this law suit the end of passivity? How you people look at yourselves in the mirror everyday shocks me.
You want to talk about lies and downright BAD scientific research, here is a recent example: http://climateaudit.org/2015/0...