Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Global Climate != Local Climate (Score 1) 385 385

Its sad to see than you can read, but fail to understand.

If I call you an idiot because I believe you to be an idiot, that is still name calling. "Rightly" doesn't factor into this.

You are acting religious, as you believe in something without foundation, only because others have told you to believe it.

Strawman argument is exactly what you did, you made an argument, projected it onto me and than used it to try and take me down. The fact that you don't realize how weak your arguments are, shows you have no good arguments and/or your arguments come from a place of emotion.

Kid :) Cute, you are trying to make yourself seem mature, older and wiser. When you just keep demonstrating you are none of those.

Comment Re: Global Climate != Local Climate (Score 1) 385 385

What's ridiculous is you, reduced to name calling to make your point because you have run out of arguments.

Building straw arguments about God , when you have no idea about my beliefs.

You presume to be an intelligent person, but you follow and parrot what others say like a sheep. Because it fits your ideology, because you believe you are righteous.
Which makes you the religious believer not I.

P.s. I don't believe in God, gods or any religion, least of all the religion of green eco terrorist evangelists and fear mongering alarmists.

Comment Re:Improving data [Re:The Gods] (Score 1) 385 385

You mean the scientific explanation that buckets and water taken from engine intakes (warmed up by hull friction and other factors, as well as taken a hugely differing depths) is better or on the same level as ARGO?

So we'll just merge them together and average it. Thats a whole lot better now. You see, its warming!

Comment Re: Global Climate != Local Climate (Score 1) 385 385

It's not.

Because you are currently living through extreme weather, does not mean it is historically exceptional.

Do some research and look up historical precipitations, droughts and other factors for the PSW.

Don't feed yourself on mainstream medias alarmist scaremongering.

Comment Re:Alarming Freedom (Score 1) 278 278

Come back to us when you understand the difference between "Science", "Research", "Scientists" and "Government grants".

Also, stop talking like Science is the bible and holds the "truth".

When you start realizing that individual research and scientists are fallible, you'll start looking and reading papers with open eyes instead of ideological blinders.

Comment Re:Alarming Freedom (Score 1) 278 278

Why is it that people distrust the government, but dont distrust government paid studies?

If the government in power has an agenda, do you not think it possible that grants would be awarded only on subjects that align with that agenda?

Somehow, research paid for by the government seems to get a pass on scrutiny, but when its paid for by anyone else it doesn't.

“We must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower

The intellectual dishonesty on this subject is mind boggling.

Comment Re:Can't reply to what you don't say (Score 1) 278 278

Oh come off, you are sounding more and more like a petulant little child.

Talking down to me, trying to ferment in the mind of readers that I'm retarded, lying or just plain ignorant.

Make an effort and read the other thread replies below your first post and you'll find what I mentioned.

If you are too lazy, then shut up and move along.

Your replies in this thread have been all about trying to knock me down a peg and not about addressing the issue.

"Mach was the greatest intellectual fraud in the last ten years." "What about X?" "I said `intellectual'." ;login, 9/1990

Working...