It depends on whether you agree with Malthus that population growth is inevitable or with Condorcet, who believed that birth control could prevent the consequences of exponential population growth.
If the population continues to grow, so too must the economy, or the share of resources available to each person will shrink. There's really no room for argument on that point.
In what sense was the Roman empire not capitalistic?
The major source of labor in the Roman Empire was slave labor, not wage labor, and the major source of wealth was military conquest rather than commerce.
It's extremely difficult for modern people living in industrialized societies to even imagine an alternative to capitalism because it's so pervasive in our world, but it hasn't been around forever and even now capitalism exists only as an imperfectly realized ideal.
I like your argument and agree with your conclusions, but dentures are millennia old at least. http://www.sciencemuseum.org.u...
A sport, by definition
Thinking that you can just assert which definition is correct and proceed from there means you don't understand what's going on. This was essentially a discussion of the definition of "sport"!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...
HAND
I looked it up and this Grizzly piss is far from impressive:
As someone who was almost hit by a bright yellow Ferrari while walking to work in Ginza, I'll take this opportunity to laugh at your ludicrous claim.
Judging from the quality of Bennett's submissions, there's probably an IQ cap, so if you didn't ride to school on a short bus you won't qualify no matter how much you are willing to pay.
Walmart isn't a third party. The charges for credit card processing are paid by the merchant.
robots, seriously
Assert your way to a better future!
You can correct for that with a massive tax on births.
Did you mean mofo, or were you trying to pin this one on Muslim Filipinos?
That is justice, though. Both as conceptualized and as realized in modern and historical societies, justice has and does include punishment and even torture. Trying to get "justice" without vengeance or punishment is futile, because these are essential aspects of justice.
Let's just move past justice and ask ourselves what would best serve us in its place.
How would abolishing capital punishment increase accuracy of verdicts in criminal cases? Presumably, sentencing innocent people to life imprisonment is also an outcome that should be avoided.
Now you're just being an idiot. It's clear evidence of what you said there was no evidence of. Please don't waste any more of my time in the future.
"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein
