Comment Re:'change' you shouldn't believe in (Score 1) 577
The AC in general has outlived it's purpose and usefulness. If you're not going to even put your handle on it, I'm not bothering with you.
The AC in general has outlived it's purpose and usefulness. If you're not going to even put your handle on it, I'm not bothering with you.
Yes, I wonder why no one has thought of having a massive, central power source. Oh, because that is stupid.
Dan: What’s the problem?
Mallory: During your broadcast on September 5th, you sang Happy Birthday to your partner, Casey McCall.
Dan: Yeah, but I can explain that. Wait, it was his birthday. Why do I have to explain that?
Mallory: You sang Happy Birthday on the air.
Mallory: Listen, I think it’s sweet that you and your partner sing to each other on television. Others may think that it’s vaguely gay, but I disagree.
Dan: Thank you.
Mallory: Nonetheless, you can’t do it anymore.
Dan: Why not?
Mallory: It’s against the law?
Dan: It’s against the law to be vaguely gay?
Mallory: It’s against the law to sing Happy Birthday on television.
Dan: Why?
Mallory: It's owned by the representatives of Mildred and Patty Hill.
Dan: It took two people to write that song?
The snakes ate them.
FTFA- He's Australian. I don't think the FBI has jurisdiction.
One has the voice-over narrative, which gives the movie a feeling reminiscent of the old "gum-shoe" detective movies from the Golden Age of Hollywood
It already had that feel in spades. Adding the voiceover just beats you over the head with it. Which I guess is appropriate, because the voiceover itself just beats you over the head with everything else.
You're no different, just coming from the other side. At least the other guy didn't act like a total prick.
I think it's the part where they suggested that you jerk off a robot. Or... maybe they're just into that.
The Supreme Court has already ruled on this issue. They said reporting on something, even if it was obtained illegally, is fine. It was in the Wall Street Journal's Saturday edition, back in the editorial section. The write cited the various applicable cases.
If you're trying to be a "professional" on iOS, you're doing it wrong.
Oh, shush you! If you don't have to search for trivial information on how to use your OS every 30 minutes, you're not using a REAL OS.
Get back to me when all the MS specific software is ported to linux.
Enable Boot Camp. Freaking newbies.
What kind of pedantic choice of interpretation is that?
Internet-pedantry, where either 1) pedantry is misapplied because the word in question does not have a single, precise definition to be pedantic over, and both the the original and the "pedant's" "pedantic" correction are correct or 2) pedantry is possible because the word does have a precise technical definition, but the "pedant" has no idea what that is and is wrong while the original usage was correct.
15,000 watts per kilo of aluminum made in electricity
For how long are 15,000 watts expended? Power usage isn't meaningful in this context. Need a duration to get energy.
"The chain which can be yanked is not the eternal chain." -- G. Fitch
