Comment Re:Guy is a moron (Score 2) 358
If this sounds like a typical firearm owner to you, you don't know many. Most you will never even know own a firearm.
If this sounds like a typical firearm owner to you, you don't know many. Most you will never even know own a firearm.
It's a lot more than a wrapper.
Your argument has no factual basis, as you don't have any data to back up a systematic bias in error rates that only goes in one direction. Absent that data, there's no reason to believe there was a biased error rate.
You mean, 15 consecutive years before all of the other previous records.
I don't store my guided missile parts at home.
Thanks for making the case that you clearly don't understand the law for me.
The difference is in whether you can prove the cop lied. All the judges I know take serious offense to being lied to, even by cops.
This will only stop when people start constructing and using guided missiles to blow up any cell tower that's not in a location already know to the public. Simply lock onto the stingray signal, and boom, no more dirty cops.
Not to judges. This will result in retrials or having sentences vacated.
You really don't know what "due process" means, do you? It's a part of legal proceedings, and employment decisions are not legal proceedings.
Due process isn't what prevents school boards from firing teachers. Teachers don't work for the school board, they work for individual schools. Those schools are run by a principal, who ultimately makes the decisions. That principal in turn reports to the district superintendent. That last person is the only one a school board can fire. Teachers are insulated from school boards by two distinct intermediaries. None of the forgoing has anything to do with "due process," at least not in anything remotely resembling a legal sense.
And the second they got teachers to agree, they'd e stopped by lawsuits. It's an absurd example.
I'll point to Afghanistan as ample evidence that a smaller forced with inferior arms can fight a modern military to a standstill. They have done it not once, but twice. Not only that, but the greater forces have been the two largest superpowers in there world. Guerrilla warfare does not really on having the biggest or most destructive arms.
Also, dependent clauses in the Constitution have consistently been ruled as not limiting the independent clauses to which they are attached. It is irrelevant that we do not use the militia as the primary defensive force today.
Yes, it's so much better to allow violent criminals to go freely about their business. Human life is sacred when it's a criminal, but fuck everyone else.
Rarely do the "don't tread on me" types commit crimes involving firearms. The same can't be said of the gangs.
Real Users know your home telephone number.