I've no idea what's been going on with slashdot for the last 6 months or so.
I do. This situation was predicted when Dice took over- More mindless, controversial articles and postvertisements = more clicks = more $$.
Everyone's got a right to their own opinion, Bennett's in this case seems to be no more relevant that a couple college kids in a dorm bullsh*t session.
Which causes me to wonder why it's on the front page of Slashdot.
It might not be long before we see a front-page post discussing the wonders of Oxy-Clean.
Because it's "News for Nerds", they'll include a blurb in the article where the ghost of Billy Mays discusses Oxy-Clean's molecular structure with Bigfoot.
Bennett sounds like he has the luxury of time in a quiet, relatively stress-free environment to calculate hazard ratios and probabilities, unlike most people thrown with little warning into a possibly contentious interrogation.
To be honest, he comes off sounding like a hair-splitting idealist.
As unlikely as it might be, If I ever find myself having to deal with US authorities in a situation involving a criminal case, I think that I'll follow Professor Duane's advice.
By the way, who is this guy that gets to editorialize on Slashdot? Are the Dice suits trying to liven things up?
If nobody visits DRMed websites I think the whole thing will sort itself out.
...and I'm starting a porcine flight training program, which is sure to be a huge success.
Amen. 'They' (Netflix and co) need the web, not the other way round.
Isn't that why they're trying to control it with crap like this?
... that such sociopaths use to try and alter the framework of the argument
Ding Ding Ding! We have a winner! One term: "Sociopath", and one phrase: "Emotionally ill" are all that anyone needs to describe this guy.
Move along, citizens, nothing more to see here....
Be a good person and you have nothing to worry about.
A "good person" according to whom? That definition might change depending upon who is calling the shots.
The same, old, trolling bullshit that gets repeated endlessly by idiots that know that they're idiots, so they post as ACs.
Commenters on Slashdot should not be able to hide behind "Anonymous Coward" to post comments like this. This kind of comment should be a bannable offense.
It's a stupid comment posted by an idiot, but what you advocate, simply because the AC's statement offended you, is much, much worse.
If you don't like it, browse comments at > +2, leave here and go to a forum that censors, or better yet, put on your big boy/girl pants and ignore it instead of trying to control everyone else's experience on
It's far from perfect, but at least Google are trying to do something and it's better than the current status quo.
In my opinion, it's little more than theater. Turn the map around for a second and look at it from the NSA's side. They have shown absolutely no hesitation to do whatever it takes to access literally everything, and from what I've read, they (or the FBI, or whoever it is that handles their direct interaction with civilians) can be damned intimidating. Do you honestly think that they would allow themselves to be cut out of a datastream as valuable as Google's? If I was them, -I- sure as hell wouldn't. It's not unreasonable to assume that they'll just go deeper and quieter, while Google tells us to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
Even then, their power is very limited by the political school boards...
Tell me about it- the public elementary school we attended was below average and needed all kinds of help. So happened that during about a 3-year window a group of -very- active parents were at the school at the same time. We managed to fund after-school activities, playground equipment, and after reaching out to some donors, we actually accumulated enough money to build on an extension to the library- no capital costs at all to the district.
We spoke to officials all through the district before we started beating the bushes for money; each and every one thought it was a great idea. We also asked the donors to talk to high-level contacts in the district to be sure- No problem. We took almost two years to raise the money, but as we were starting to engage the architects to draw plans that the district could approve, we were told to stand down, because it wouldn't be fair to the other elementary schools in the district that didn't have nice libraries. When we went back and spoke to the officials that previously had said it was a good idea, the responses were along the lines of "we didn't think you'd actually do it".
I was with you until your last sentence and then you showed your true colors. So you lost your argument by showing that you are nothing more then a prat.
Imagine my concern.
"It is better for civilization to be going down the drain than to be coming up it." -- Henry Allen