It would be OK if there were an option to pay for the app and have no advertising.
Or even if google play let me filter the apps by their funding model.
I absolutely do not want ads on my phone, under any circumstances. I'd rather pay the developer.
I agree. Having been given an unwanted present of an iPad (and now I can't get myself a real tablet for fear of offense), I'd really like to see a port of Firefox to Cydia. Actually, given that the GNU utils and X server already exist, why not port a window-manager too, and run a real OS on it?
Rather than buying a new TV, consider doing what I did: find a nice large LCD monitor, take off the plastic, and take it to a picture-framers. Then get it framed in the style you like. I now have an antique gilded-frame that plays DVDs
Also, get a NAS unit in your basement, then make sure all your computing hardware is dead silent. It's so nice that way!
Almond milk is too expensive, and imho, soy milk is unspeakable (I'd rather not have milk at all). But seriously, why use a cow, which is such an inefficient bioreactor?
It *is* really awkward - I agree, and especially it's hard to accurately distinguish left-arrow from down-arrow. But if you have hands in typing position (eg for a trackpoint-style keyboard), then the minimal movement of the hands is to use RH pinky. It's the finger I probalby use most, for shift, and the 4 arrow keys.
[Btw, none of my keyboards, either desktop or laptop, have a numeric keypad]
The right pinky is used all the time for the arrow keys! And these get pressed multiple times to move around.
If we can take grain + yeast and get beer, then why can't we design a yeast-variant that produces milk? After all, grass and wheat are very similar.
Of course we might not get all the complex proteins and enzymes required to make good cheese - but it should be possible to get a perfectly decent product for putting in coffee, making ice-cream, and pouring over cereal. A cow is a terribly inefficient way to convert grass into milk - we should be able to do better.
What do you do when you want to use Linux software raid, but the server only comes with a hardware raid controller, and won't let you have direct disk access? This has been the case with all my recent IBM and HP servers.
I see why it's hard to run another distro natively. But why not run a small Linux inside a VM, and connect to it fullscreen with VNC or X? That would be almost as good, and shouldn't be that hard to do - the compilers already exist for the apps, and both VNC client and X11 client (technically, server) programs exist already.
If I were Samsung, I think I'd fund such a porting effort out of pique!
Is there any chance to put another OS on the iPad?
It would be a great way to get an Android tablet with a proper 4:3 display and good speakers. Or why not run X11 on it, and LOCAL applications (or VNC and a local install of android or a regular Linux).
Also, once jailbroken, is there a way to make the Music/Video/Photo apps recognise files that were loaded on using SSH rather than iTunes?
Interesting point about the Office 365. The problem with the MS viewers is that they can't save the document in a non MS-format. And LibreOffice can't perfectly import the more awkward bits of MS documents.
This is the question. What I'm trying to do is arrange the "5 MS machines in a corner, walk over there and take your turn" approach, but without the walking. The company would generally have zero users making use of MSO; it just needs to know that all 100 of them could, if they had to, have occasional access. The Windows machine could be a single-user box, running a single shared "public" account.
Otherwise, what would it take to have a system that could script MS Office, to provide, say, a web-service that could take in an awkward powerpoint, and spit out a PDF, in a compatible way?
What I'd like to know is whether we can have a way to time-share Windows applications. Consider an office of 100 people. At the moment, they all of MS Office installed, just in case they get an attachment that LibreOffice can't handle. That's 100 copies of the MSO license.
We'd like to move them to Linux, and LO, but still need that MSO capability just occasionally. So the obvious way is to set up 100 free desktops, and put 5 Windows+MSO machines in the corner, people can then walk over, queue up, and use the MSO machines if they really must. Result: only pay MS for 5 licenses, and start escaping lock-in.
But that's really ugly. Is there any elegant way to do this seamlessly for the end user, with VNC or similar? We need to ensure that 100 people can all (potentially) access MSO in their own environmnent (own PC, own view of the fileshare, if possible, own preferences), but with some sort of queuing system that shares out the access.
I'm aware of the ugliness if 6 people need MSO at the same time, and that this might not work well for video, or advanced powerpoint. But otherwise, how might it be done? (And given that MS might not *like* it, how do we stay legally covered. IMHO, this is perfectly fair, because MSO is only ever installed on 5 PCs, and only ever used by 5 people at a time).
Interestingly, that's not the whole story.
In Bash, the $ sign is a unary operator that means "replace NAME by its VALUE". That's why, in Bash, assignment of variables is done without $ signs. For example:
fruit=apple; echo $fruit. It's also why the bash shell allows $ to do so many things, such as ${filename%.extn} (strip off the extension from a filename).
In PHP, $ isn't an operator, but a symbol that means "variable". This is useful for clarity, especially when there are so many keywords around, and when a variable could be auto-vivified (and shouldn't be confused with a constant, or an unknown keyword).
Also, interestingly, $1 and $2 etc are meaningful in Bash and Perl, but in PHP, they are NOT variables. They get used in SQL query parameters, but otherwise, the $ is considered literal. Eg echo "this is $1"
Perl distinguishes variable scope between scalar/array/hash. PHP allows a variable to be either (and sometimes to swap types), and considers "array" and "hash" to be basically the same thing.
Linux fonts always have been rather a nightmare. There are really only 4 solutions:
1. Learn to live with blurry antialiased fonts. In my experience, about 80% of people actually prefer them that way. Windows defaults to "cleartype".
[Some people (like you and I) really don't like them this way, and hate the colour-fringing from sub-pixel antialiasing; we'd rather have clear and sharp letters than care about the glyphs looking different in different typefaces]
2. Go back to the old (2000-era) 75-dpi and 100-dpi fixed (non-scalable) fonts.
3. Get a very high DPI screen. (I got a 2048x1536 15" LCD panel); this makes the antialiasing work OK becasue you can't see the pixels.
4. Choose your fonts very carefully, turn on hinting, disable antialiasing below 15 pt. (You may need to change your libfreetype for one with the bytecode interpreter enabled - software patent). Personally, I use Terminus for the terminal, and 8-point Tahoma everywhere else.
To fetch the latter, first install cabextract, then:
wget http://download.microsoft.com/download/ie6sp1/finrel/6_sp1/W98NT42KMeXP/EN-US/IELPKTH.CAB &&
cabextract -F 'tahoma*ttf' IELPKTH.CAB &&
mkdir -p
chmod 644
HTH
God help those who do not help themselves. -- Wilson Mizner
