But what if they have a mole in your counter-espionage research department?
Perhaps the GP planned to unzip his skin down the back, peel it forward, and present his entire "surface area" to the sun?
** shudder **
When this packet hits a pocket on a socket on a port,
Your whole damn OS pauses to abort...
Your confusion amuses me.
Pete Townsend's grandchildren!
Well, if we can skip the mercury component, it might be significantly more environmentally friendly.
I will never look at a bunny the same way again...
**shudders**
I can assure you that Dust Devils are quite common on this mudball we call home:
http://images.google.ca/images?hl=en&q=dustdevil&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2&aq=f&oq=
A couple of the more awe-inspiring shots:
http://www.crh.noaa.gov/images/lmk/photo_album/wxdata/dustdevil_LEX1.jpg
http://www.crh.noaa.gov/images/lmk/Drought/sep07/glendale_med.jpg
thanks for those links, that second one from milkw0rm is just jaw-dropping...
I'll second that!
I'm glad that I don't run their software for my hosted clients, that's for sure!
For one (admittedly extreme) example, GCC -> EGCS. The fork was so successful that it was eventually accepted by the FSF as the official GCC.
Commodore,
His baby monitor has just as much right to operate in the frequency bands that routers do. The whole "unlicensed" part means that you can basically do what you want with that portion of the spectrum, so long as you don't intentionally cause interference (AKA run a jammer) and keep your broadcasts under a certain power level. Baby monitors probably don't count as jammers.
And there isn't any laws that say it has to play nice with, or even use the same channels, as 802.11 b/g.
How are your packets more legitimate than his analogue audio transmission?
What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite. -- Bertrand Russell, "Skeptical Essays", 1928