Comment Re:Jail time (Score 1) 538
irrelevant. You have to prove she broke the law before you can say she needs to be punished for breaking it. We are the land of the free.
irrelevant. You have to prove she broke the law before you can say she needs to be punished for breaking it. We are the land of the free.
That is why there are convicted felons in the party who get their support, because they hate it and dont want to support them, such as Grimm, who had support and voted in while on trial....
Who said she broke laws? Was there a conviction? When was the trial? My issue is with that he jumped past arrested and tried and wanted summary execution of punishment. If you want to see this investigated and tried by all means, but to disallow her due process just because you dont like her, and me pointing out the problem with that is more your problem then me "kissing the heck out of Hillary's backside". But I guess with your "with us or against us" mentality what else would I expect.
Any evidence of this? Did you read the part about how this law is rarely if ever prosecuted?
We know because you make logical leaps with information not in evidence. There is no evidence that there was
breach of security
, yet you make make that accusation anyways.
So no trial, just execution of punishment? No thought into if the emails were actually stored or not, just punishment because you dont agree with her politics?
Part of the problem that it does not matter if she was using personal email or not. If she wanted to make deals with her rich chums she could do it in person, or via private communications even if she was officially using official emails for work.
Communities and public utilities can already offer service in thief own areas, this change would allow them to offer service in other communities, exchanging their old provider for another, neither owned or controlled by them.
this is not true in these states. Wilson and Chattanooga got grandfathered in because they already built their network before the laws took effect.
If I live in a community that is served electricity by power company A, and power company B in the neighboring community offers internet access that I want, allowing power company B to sell Internet access in the territory served by Power company A isn't 'self-ownership'... If the county next to me offers Internet access and now they can offer Internet service in my county, does my county now control the Internet backbone in our county or does the neighboring community?
You are using a rather limited definition for the work community. I live in NC, near Wilson but outside of any area they will probably service, however I can give you a perfect example of how terribly limited your definition is. I live in an area with the City designation of Garner NC, however I dont live in Garner, because I live across the Wake (Garner's county)/Johnston country line. I can walk to the Wake county side and bike to the city limits, but I am still in that postal area. This is also a fairly large area that straddles the county line. It would be pretty hard to not call my area part of the garner community. We still get a lot of garner names in our businesses and services.
Wilson made a profit last year....
8 pages of rules, 290+ pages of precedent, forbearance, and other non rules. You can see what the rules are on their website, if you actually cared, and did not just want to attack them...
Obama care was also not rushed. If you think the Republicans did not read it you are dead wrong. The we have to pass it to see whats in it comment was talking about the populace, not congress, but again I am sure you dont care about these facts.
And they are not preempting the ban. They can still ban it, but if they dont they cannot restrict it to imaginary boundaries.
What is the difference between creating a fast lane and creating a slow lane? there isnt really one...
not having been released yet is not the same thing as being kept secret...
You dont have to join the union just because the unions organizes there, however typically there is a vote that needs a majority of the members to vote yes before the union can setup shop, read about the VW plant in Tennessee.
If the court said it would have to be CLASSIFIED as a title 2 you would have a point, but it said they would have to reclassify it. That is an apples an oranges comparison to your analogy. It is like telling congress they would have to change law. It implies they have the authority to do something.
Recent investments will yield a slight profit.