Comment Re:Potayto/potatoh (Score 1) 1073
and what the point might be?
and what the point might be?
Just that if someone wants to protect the term "marriage" from gays by turning the government backed marriages into civil unions and only allowing churches to do "marriages", they will be suprised that it wont prevent gays from getting married.
If you can choose your sexuality, then why don't you try it for a week or two? This week watch straight porn and be aroused by that and then choose to be gay and watch more straight porn, it shouldn't arouse you then but gay sex should.
They would need to revoke more than just tax breaks. That is one valid way to fix the situation, just remove marriage from the laws, all of them. I wonder which one would upset the community more, adding a new group to get access to already existing laws and benefits or removing them all?
Your workaround doesn't really work, someone can just organize a new church that allows gay marriage and then gays can also get married. Not that this is a problem for me, but it might be a problem to those who are against gay marriage
If you allow churches to decide what is marriage, what prevents me from founding a church that allows marriage for polygamist?
I recall that at one point the church was against marriage (in Europe around the middle ages).
If you allow churches to use "marriage" as purely ceremonial term, what prevents some church wedding gays?
So it shouldn't be called marriage until you have at least one child born into the union of two people?
It made into my desktop, but why should it be on everyones desktop?
There is now, it died due to the extra p.
Unless you are moonwalking
I guess it might depend where you live, some countries have rulings that say you must be allowed to resell downloaded games too and I think EU is working on a directive to make this into a law.
I am assuming that extinction level impact asteroid wont be short notice one, and smaller ones will just spread into a multiple chunks that do more damage to multiple locations.
DON'T!
The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford